User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes2013

I may not find the time this year to provide the level of detail on my votes I have provided in the past, unless things settle down over the next week with student editing hitting medical articles. Check back in a week; I may have found time.

There are not nine good candidates this year; in fact, there are not six good candidates this year. As I have said in past guides, I believe that ArbCom is too large, and that we should not appoint lesser qualified candidates who receive low percentage support. If a voter feels that there are not nine qualified candidates, they do not have cast nine votes. I will not be trying to cast nine votes this year, and do not think that a slightly smaller ArbCom is a problem. I expect to be mostly voting No this year, as we regretfully do not have the quality of candidates we have had in the past.

Support
I will be supporting Floquenbeam for the reasons well expressed by NuclearWarfare and our friendly neighborhood 'zilla.

I'm still working on my Support list, but Boing! said Zebedee's guide is pretty well aligned with my reasoning and votes, except that I've never heard of Kraxler, and expect to have less Supports than Boing!

More to come!

Past guides:
 * User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes2012
 * User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes2011
 * User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes2010
 * User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes2009