User:Saniabenie/sandbox

Child Access Prevention Law : Article review

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, the article’s content is relevant to topic Is it written neutrally? The article is written in a neutral, non biased tone, even though some can say that there are not enough representation of both sides but the reason for this might as well be the lack of sources for facts against the law. Does each claim have a citation? Yes Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? the claims made to support the law are up to date since the article uses studies done in 2019. But claims against the law are very old and should be improve if there is any changes of views. What else could be improved? We can look and review the effectiveness of the Eddie Eagle Gunsafe since it has been used by the NRA to be against the CAP law even thou there hasn't been any studies to back up its effectiveness. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There is no conversation in the talk page. According to the article on "child access prevention law," There are different level of laws that are enforced when it comes to CAP, but the highest and probably most severe one is the laws that inflict criminal liability when a firearm that wasn’t kept in a safely manner is gained access to by a child. The law says that if a gun that was negligently stored get used by a minor to injure or kill someone, the owner of the firearm will be responsible therefore he will be fined, put to prison, or even in some cases both.

I reviewed the "gun control" article, and overall it is a pretty clear article that doesn't show any apparent bias to the findings. The article reviewed different papers to better explain and give a overview of the whole idea of gun control which as the article explained has caused a lot of division in the United States and around the world. The article is pretty well balanced and written.