User:Sansvoix/Archive1

"Cleaning up" talk pages
Standard practice at Wikipedia is to archive talk into an archive page created with a slash. Otherwise it appears that the user was trying to hide the comments on the talk page by deleting them. An example archive would be User talk:Sansvoix/Archive1. Hu 04:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * SANSVOIX. HERE is some comments you have been COVERING UP (yes, it can be found in your history).  DONT YOU DARE REMOVE IT!


 * "I believe that my contribution to the U.S. article was a positive one..."
 * "Sorry, didn't mean to be offensive..."
 * "makes it seem like the article is expressing an opinion..."
 * "Again, I didn't mean to be anti-social...I wasn't persnally attacking anyone"
 * "unsigned bullet points (put there by you) making it seem like there are a lot of people with "For Removal" views"
 * "your posts should be signed"
 * "How is the article "borderline satire"?"
 * "Your recent edit left the last paragraph unintelligible"

Yours truly,--Koool 05:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Taking comments out of context is a deceitful debating technique. Please don't indulge. Hu 05:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Sansvoix is the one being decietfull. He has been told time and time again.  Not to cover up the criticisms on his talk page..

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASansvoix&diff=30164987&oldid=28010462
 * I can see how Hu would be quick to defend him though (a brother socialist), Hu arn't you the one who edited Christianity out of the socialism article? Talk:Socialism--Koool 05:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * You don't have a clue about my political beliefs. I didn't edit Christianity out of the Socialism article. I edited one non-Neutral point of view sentence out of one paragraph. Hu 05:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it Hu, I'm used to running into these people on Wikipedia. All the time.--sansvoix 05:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)