User:Santanavictianny/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Meno

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I choose this article because not only does it have to do about my major but it talks about socrates, which is one of my favorite philosophers to read about. I've learned a lot about his story especially Platos story about his death, which I find very interesting. However I don't remember reading in my other classes much about this Meno, more about Crito and Phaedo, so I choose this one to make it a little different. This article matters because this is one of his most important articles that he has written. My impression was that it was pretty good. It was engaging to the reader most of the time.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) I would change change some wording around. I feel like there are some poor choice of words that could be said differently. I also think that "Menos Paradox" at the very first paragraph should have a link, or at least where they are getting this from. Some citations is missing in this article. I do see that all the sources work. Overall I believe it was a good article, It still feels alittle bit like a college essay but it is informative. They cover all aspects of the topic in this article. This article is involved in 4 wikiprojects. In the talk page they agree that it does sound alittle like. a college essay and they talk about the writer having alot of original research that should not be added without secondary research done.