User:Santasa99/sandbox8

Meatpuppetry: Turkish Croatia editing and merger proposal

 * (problematic page, w/t history of extended protections)
 * (destination for proposed merger and its TP is place for merger discussion)

(Meatpuppetry: Ivan Gundulić)

 * ( (not investigated in full for this report))

Turkish Croatia: merger proposal and discussion

 * Talk:Bosanska Krajina # Merger discussion (17:52, 21 August 2019);

Editors antagonistic to this proposal, Ceha and Silverije (extent of Shokatz participation could be noted only as bellow) resorted to solicitation of help, support in reverts, and voting on merger, while campaigning outside English language Wikipedia, namely by placing inciting request at Croatian language Wikipedia.

Editors who participated on Turkish Croatia→Bosanska Krajina (English and Croatian language wikipedia)
Editors who participated, both at Croatian and English lang. wikipedia, in debates over English language wikipedia article, and/or voted in line with Ceha's and Silverije's requests, whose appearance correspond to hr.wikipedia debates on the English lang. wikipedia article various issues:

English wikipedia

 * (active senior editor at hr.wikipedia and participant in discussions at various pages on that project, as noted bellow)
 * (editor at hr.wikipedia, w/t 9 edits at English wikipedia at that point and still at the same number)
 * (admin at hr.wikipedia)
 * (editor at hr.wikipedia, w/t 9 edits at English wikipedia at that point and still at the same number)
 * (admin at hr.wikipedia)

Croatian wikipedia

 * Kubura
 * Ceha
 * Silverije
 * Mateo K 01
 * Lordluka99

Canvasing evidence (by date):
Following exchanges are evident instances of written solicitation at Croatian language wikipedia project (what was going on beyond these pages (WP:STEALTH) is obviously unknown):


 * 10 and 11 August Kubura talk page: "Turkish Croatia", Ceha's request for assistance over "Turkish Croatia" directed at hr.wikipedia admin Kubura - exchange: Ceha (22:38, 10 August 2019) and Kubura (21:33, 11 August 2019);
 * 31 August - 1 September Kubura talk page: "Turkish Croatia (2)", exchange as continuation of Ceha's "Turkish Croatia" request directed at admin Kubura - Silverije (23:50, 31 August 2019), Mateo (10:02, 1 September 2019), Silverije (19:43, 1 September 2019), Kubura (21:32, 1 September 2019);
 * 3 September 2019 editor Ceha also alerting Silverije to: take an eye onto discussion at User_talk:Peacemaker67#Turkish_Croatia - Ceha (15:09, 3 September 2019);
 * 2 and 4 September Silverije talk page: en.wiki Mateo K 01 reply to Silverije (as continuation of "Turska Hrvatska (2)" exchange at Kubura talk page) - Mateo K 01 (21:21, 2 September 2019 and 13:44, 4 September 2019);
 * 4 September Mateo K 01 talk page: en.wiki Silverije reply to Mateo (as continuation of "Turska Hrvatska (2)" exchange at Kubura talk page) - Silverije (00:41, 4 September 2019 and 22:31, 4 September 2019 and 13:44, 4 September 2019);
 * 4 and 15 September 2019 Croatian wikipedia "Village pump" ("Kafić") (sub)page titled "Listing of defects at English wikipedia": Turkish Croatia, another instance initiated by Silverije (22:06, 4 September 2019) and responded by Mateo K 01 (23:19, 15 September 2019);
 * 4 September 2019 Kafić/Village pump "Listing of defects at English wikipedia": Tražim pomoć/Seeking assistance, by Silverije (23:33, 4 September 2019);
 * 6 September 2019 editor Silverije alerting Shokatz: emphatically asking Shokatz if they can send them (Silverije) an email (15:19, 6 September 2019);
 * 7 September 2019 Kafić/Village pump "Listing of defects at English wikipedia": new post by Silverije on impending: Glasovanje/Voting (23:41, 7 September 2019);
 * 8 September 2019‎ User:DraconicDark, as uninvolved editor, unambiguously announced CANVASING in his comment at the target page Bosanska Krajina Talk page, where discussion on merger was taking place, and attracting my attention to it: with this alert (17:36, 8 September 2019‎);
 * 16 September 2019 ANI was filed: Merger discussion disrupted by Meatpuppetry (03:06, 16 September 2019);
 * 2 October 2019 Silverije announcing in Kafić/Village pump: existence of pages where editors can list and discuss what they perceive as "flawed" or "defective" at the German and English language wikipedias (17:29, 2 October 2019);
 * 19 November 2019‎ Mikola22 included his: vote (19:08, 19 November 2019)

Kafić, Village pump of hr.wikipedia project, has these two pages:
 * Listing of defects at English wikipedia, with mentioning of articles on en.wikipedia where they felt help was needed, such as Ivan Gundulić (here, where Mateo K 01, Silverije, and another of three most abusive Croatian project's admins, Zeljko, debated from 4 September to 4 October 2019), some of the discussions on Turkish Croatia, listed above, are also here;
 * Listing of defects at German wikipedia.

Ceha and Kubura (10-11 August Kubura Talk page)

 * Maestro, I have a strange situation here (ed. note [Ceha pointing to discussion at User:Oshwah Talk page]). I think it's a troll, the man remade the whole thing with Turkeish Croatia into a story with Austro-Hungarian imperialist and Croatian nationalist pretensions against "eternal Bosnia". Any advice would be valuable. --Ceha (talk) 22:38, 10 August 2019
 * Ceha, here, I just answered to them something. --Kubura (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2019
 * - Kubura at Oshwah Talk page (19:27, 11 August 2019)

Silverije-Mateo K 01-Silverije-Kubura (31 August - 1 September Kubura Talk page)

 * Hi maestro, I know you have a lot of work to do and I wouldn't want to burden you even more, since Ceha already asked you about twenty days ago, but I've had enough of that vandal Santasse99 and his persistent harassment over the Turkish Croatia article ('write-delete-write-delete' and so on indefinitely). Thank you for your admirable respond to the admin Oshwah, but the vandal in question (ed. note [me]) cannot be christened. Moreover, he threatens to merge the article into the Bosnian Krajina article. Maybe you have an idea to get this thing resolved so that the article doesn't have to be reverted all the time? Thank you in advance for your reply. --Silverije (talk) 23:50, 31 August 2019
 * (ed. note [nota bene]) @Silverije, if I may interfere, with my own thoughts briefly. Just now I noticed that administrator who protected that article (ed. note [probably admins User:Peacemaker67 or User:EdJohnston who both participated]) advocates Serb-Croatist agenda. I am telling you this from my own experiences with them, that is hopeless case for me. English Wikipedia is (just like de.wiki (ed. note [German language wikipedia])) are both rotten systems. We should use our own human resources and our time for our own, Croatian wikipedia, we are here on our own turf. --Mateo K 01 (talk) 10:02, 1 September 2019
 * @Mateo K 01, thanks for your thoughts. I hope that Kubura won't mind if I respond here. I absolutely agree with second part of your statement (to commit our efforts to our own hr-Wiki, something that Kubura told me already), but I wouldn't call all article (ed. note [on English Wikipedia]) hopeless cases. Maybe article "Turkish Croatia" is lost (but there are old sayings: "Time will tell" and "Never say never"), however there are still lots of articles which were or still are in the same situation (ed. note [like Turkish Croatia]), so I think that we need to fight to present them in line with Croatian historiography (ed. note [or what they, at hr.wikipedia, believe is Croatian historiography]), and not in line with Bosniak and Serb one (for example Ivan Gundulić) (ed. note [article in English, disrupted with prolonged edit wars]), in Hungarian (for example Zrinski), in Italian, etc. Though, it appears that majority of college-editors do not share same opinion with me. I this concrete case of Turkish Croatia, only college Čeha participated against vandalism, while others (who work at Eenglish Wiki) whom I contacted and asked for support and suggestion on what to do against those vandals (among them English Wikipedia administrator, one of our own (ed. note [Croat])), and they failed to respond. It would be different story if two-three of them came to our aid. And then, that administrator appeared (ed. note [still not clear, User:Peacemaker67 or User:EdJohnston, at this point]), just as you say, who advocate Serb-Croatistic agenda, and he did what he did (ed. note [protected the article]). That one, by the way, is too familiar to me for some time now, and he's some retired officer of Australian army. I can't tell if behind that one squatting some little Australian Serb-Chetnik (ed. note [at this point they clearly refer to admin User:Peacemaker67). Ok, move on. If needed "to battle, to battle" (ed. note [part of the battle cry in Croatian: "u boj, u boj, za narod svoj" in English: "to battle, to battle, for our people"]) ... Cheers. --Silverije (talk) 19:43, 1 September 2019
 * @Silverije, it's more likely that article in version from Croatian wikipedia appears in Serbian and Bosniak wikipedia, than those who took-over the English wikipedia are capable to understand and accept our explanations. It's a clique that impose their own agendas. Don't waste a nanosecond on them. --Kubura (talk) 21:32, 1 September 2019

Silverije to Mateo K 01 (4 September Mateo K 01 Talk page)

 * Hello, Mateo! Thank you on your suggestion to be careful not to make unnecessary mistake. Hopefully I won't. For now they are just observing me, as they say: I am under the discrete sanctions (in dictionary writes: arbitrarily, indefinite) of their ARB COM, composed of eight wise-man or wise-woman (because nowadays each masculine noun must have also feminine counterpart, therefore female huntsman became huntswoman, however it's yet unknown to me how should we call female knight, as if it's ever existed, maybe she-knight?), among whom there are, for instance, those who call themselves Gorila (ed. note [most likely User:GorillaWarfare ARBCOM admin]), (explosive vomiting volcano) Krakatau (ed. note [most likely referring to User:KrakatoaKatie ARBCOM admin]), and Unaprijed Smišljeni Kaos (ed. note [most likely User:Premeditated Chaos ARBCOM admin]). So, now you can contemplate on who is deciding on your faith! And do you know why am I under the observation? Because I wrote that Ivan Gundulić is Croatian writer, while Serbs and administrators say he is ra-guzni author (ed. note [ra-guzni refers to Ragusa in pejorative way, as the name deconstructed into two syllables Ra-guza, the second one infers "guzica" (or "ass" in English) from diminutive "guza"]). That is Dubrovnik writer. However, it's not me who wrote that in the first place, I just re-wrote what was written into the Gundulić article long time ago, but removed by Serbophiles. That's it! And that's how I ended up under observation. Maybe, they are going to start referring to me as Hannibal Lecter or someone similar. And, as you say, Serbo-Croatist clique (we can freely refer to them as being Serbophiles) is getting bigger and bigger, and more insolent and brazen, and is no longer little clique but enormous one. And consequently, frustration getting bigger and bigger too. But, we are going to see (yet). Even blind say: we are going to see (ed. note [what will happen])! Hope dies last. But, what am I writing here. That's not encyclopedic level. Is it essay, maybe? Or, is Tanja Torbarina entered inside me? (Better, if it's other way around.) (ed. note [Tanja Torbarina is prominent Yugoslav and Croatian essayist and author, she is of liberal, left-leaning provenience, and vocal anti-nationalist]) It should be erased (or deleted). Are yonder administrators-arbiters watching? For sure someone is going to tell on me. OK, enough of that. Old people say: bear no grudge. With respect, --Silverije (talk) 00:41, 4 September 2019 (CEST)


 * Here, I just wrote a text about Turkish Croatia in Kafić/Village pump's Listing of defects at English wikipedia. Is there any college capable to find some rational administrator, bureaucrat or steward there, who is willing to read that and post it on relevant boards for discussion, it's hard to tell. Maybe we in Croatia lack people of such a caliber, who would, without fear of retaliation, present the facts, evidences, reliable sources, and so forth, but I am bewildered with the passivity of Croatian emigration in the English language countries, who speak English mother-tongue and who can wrestle with Croatian enemies there. --Silverije (talk) 22:31, 4 September 2019 (CEST)

Mateo K 01 to Silverije (2 and 4 September Silverije Talk page)

 * I will reply here, so that we avoid overwhelming Kubura's Talk page. Yes, you are quite right that there are articles in which they are still failing to squeeze in and promote their own point of view. But, let's not forget that their admis are the one who can "de facto" decide which side/direction will article take. An administrators' authority undoubtedly is in theirs hands. I presume that there are other admins who would disagree with this (ed. note [those who would be more susceptible to POV of portion of Croatian language wikipedia community]), but they are silent for the simple reason of fear of being labeled as "nationalists" by Serbo-Croatist clique. It's little bit odd to offer advice to you as an experienced editor, but, don't allow your emotions or frustration push you into committing some mistake which would gave them opportunity to abuse their power and block you. It happened to me on de.wiki (ed. note [German language wikipedia]). Cheers. --Mateo K 01 (talk) 21:21, 2 September 2019. (CEST)
 * 27, I don't know if you noticed, but we have Listing of defects at English wikipedia (ed. note [on hr.wikipedia "Village pump" is called "Kafić" and page in question is Listing of defects at English wikipedia]). Who knows, maybe we get a chance to present these defects to a wider Croatian public. In any caase it's worth the effort to document this encyclopedic tyranny. Look, here I just right now added Ivan Gundulić article (ed. note [to the listing]). If you have time and if you are willing, expend on "Turkish Croatia". Cheers.|undefined --Mateo K 01 (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2019

=
"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # Turkish Croatia (4 and 15 September 2019 Croatian wikipedia Kafić/Village pump)=====
 * Article Turkish Croatia exists already number of years, albeit going between Scylla and Charybdis, attacked from all sides (see article history) (ed. note [three attempts to merge, first successful but reverted by Silverije himself]). A year ago, User:santasa99 appeared and since then, continuous and systematically, and ever more insolently (to the point of hysteria), started changing text of that article on his own will, ignoring and showing no appreciation for earlier provided sources, either textual, pictorial or cartographic. Old authentic Hapsburg's maps of Turkish Croatia labeled, for example, as „some maps“ from 19th century which served Austria-Hungarian expansion. None of Anglo-American administrators wanted to react in attempt to stop that, which encouraged him even more (ed. note [me]). He told various nonsense such as that label Turkish Croatia is neologism (linguistic novelty), hapax (word which appears once at the time in some language), claptrap (hollow phrase) etc., while in his own version of the text (which, as I write this, is protected from editing) he inserted mindless things that have no relation with an original text, speaking, for example, of war in Bosnia and Herzegovina of 1990's, Franjo Tuđman, Ivo Pilar and other, presenting Bosniak (ed. note [Bosnian Muslims]) propaganda. His version of text is one sort of political pamphlet, and is unrelated to original text, which speaks of distant past. As such this version doesn't fulfills encyclopedic standards and criterias. Nevertheless, even that isn't enough, so User:Santasa99 working on article Turkish Croatia merger, that is to include it into article Bosanska Krajina, with a support of Anglo-American and Australian administrators. Nevermind that the territory of Turkish Croatia geographically doesn't correspond in full with the territory of Bosanska Krajina, because the border between Hapsburg and Turkey (ed. note [the standard derogatory racist trope where the "Ottomans" are labeled the "Turks", so that in this way any Ottoman Empire's subject, especially local inhabitants of Balkans, becomes the "Turk" in the eyes of nationalists and racists, in this case Bosnians of Islamic faith becomes the "Turks"]) changed over the centuries, depending on military successes in battles and wars. So, at the end, if nobody counteract this process at the article Talk page, and merger gets proposed, Turkish Croatia will disappear as if never existed, and that only Bosanska krajina always existed there. This is in line of well-known Greater Serbian concept, only now in Bosniak variant. --Silverije (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2019


 * It is disgraceful for this case to include English administrators if they allow this merger of significantly different articles to get through. On the article Talk page they started to stray away form the topic, which is obvious sign that arguments are on our side. (ed. note [when talking about "straying away form the topic", Mateo K 01 is, actually, referring to User:DraconicDark presenting evidence for obvious Meatpuppetry, noting in his comment that some of the editors participating in evident canvasing on Croatian language wikipedia]) --Mateo K 01 (talk) 23:19, 15 September 2019

=
"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # Tražim pomoć/Seeking assistance (4 and 15 September 2019 Kafić/Village pump)=====
 * I just published my text in Kafić/Village pump under "Listing of defects at English wikipedia" associated to the article Turkish Croatia [9], describing situation where some agitate for merger of that article into Bosanska Krajina, which is unacceptable (see my explanation in mentioned "Listing of defects at English wikipedia", and also extensive explanation in English Wikipedia talk page for that article). If yonder agitator User:Santasa99 is allowed to solicit aid (and he was getting that aid from Anglo-American and Australian administrators (ed. note [referring to User:EdJohnston and User:Peacemaker67 admis])), than perhaps I can solicit aid on my own, at least on Croatian Wikipedia. Therefore, I beg all willing and able to help to join, especially when voting begins (most likely today or tomorrow). I thank you in advance, and cheers. --Silverije (talk) 23:33, 4 September 2019

"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # impending Glasovanje/Voting (7 September 2019 Kafić/Village pump)

 * I am informing everyone who wish to participate (see above text (ed. note ["above text" is explanation why should everyone take part in editing, discussion and voting on Turkish Croatia])) that the voting on Turkish Croatia merger with the article Bosanska Krajina is now OPENED. --Silverije (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2019

Spilling over into en.wikipedia: help and support acquired through Ceha's and Silverije's solicitation

 * 11 August 2019 Kubura first response to Ceha's call: (19:27, 11 August 2019) at User:Oshwah Talk page discussion on Turkish Croatia;
 * - same day Kubura at his hr.wikipedia TP confirms to Ceha that he reacted on Ceha's request: (21:33, 11. August 2019) (exchange noted above as "10 - 11 August Kubura talk page");


 * 12 September 2019 hr.wikipedia admin Kubura second response to Ceha's call: Talk:Turkish Croatia (21:27, 12 September 2019);
 * 14 September 2019 hr.wikipedia admin Kubura third response to Ceha's call Talk:Bosanska Krajina voting (21:44, 14 September 2019);


 * 02:23, 8 September 2019‎ Mateo K 01
 * 00:43, 10 September 2019‎ Mateo K 01
 * 00:50, 14 September 2019‎ Mateo K 01


 * 09:26, 8 September 2019‎ Lordluka99


 * 19:08, 19 November 2019‎ Mikola22
 * (ed. note: Mateo and Silverije voted twice, and with Ceha left numerous comments.)

Editors who participated in canvassing on set of 6 history articles (English and Croatian language wikipedia)
Editors who participated, both at Croatian and English lang. wikipedia, in debates over English language wikipedia articles various issues:

Croatian wikipedia

 * Ceha
 * Silverije

Canvasing evidence (by date):
Following links are evidence of written solicitation at Croatian language wikipedia project:


 * 2 December 2019 Ceha again soliciting assistance in Kafić (Village pump of hr.wikipedia) on six (6) articles on medieval history of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Ceha's edit prev (03:10, 23 December 2019)
 * 1 Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić; this post refers to English lg. wikipedia article Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić;
 * 2 "Entitet" Bosna; this post refers to English lg. wikipedia article Bosnia (early medieval polity);
 * 3 Donji Kraji; this post refers to English lg. wikipedia article Donji Kraji;
 * 4 & 5 Banovina i kraljevina Bosna; this post refers to English lg. wikipedia articles Banate of Bosnia and Kingdom of Bosnia;
 * 6 Usora; this post refers to English lg. wikipedia article Usora.

=
"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić (23 December 2019 Kafić/Village pump)===== Same story, same Santas99 user. The man replaced the Hrvatinić's coat of arms, which is documented, , with something that looks like a Bosniak national symbol and violates all the rules of medieval heraldry, putting metal on metal (gold on silver), no... Hrvatinić is literally made into Turković ([ed.note (well, User:Čeha is using a slur against Bosnian Muslims deriding them as supposed Turks, by invoking sardonically South-Slavic surname "Turković" consisting of ethnonym "Turk" and South-Slavic surname suffix "ić", and it's juxtaposed over Hrvatinić, a surname believed by nationalist is created with the same arrangement, that is, as if "Hrvatin" supposedly comes from ethnonym "Hrvat/Croat", which with suffix "ić" makes "Hrvatinić")]). --Čeha (Talk) 03:10, 23 December 2019

=
"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # "Entitet"_Bosna (23 December 2019 Kafić/Village pump)===== Again the same user. A new entity is invented, Bosnia, which has existed independently since the 7th century, without any trace. Traces of the Croatian name are systematically erased, Serbian authors are being quoted (Mrgić) [ed. obviously ultimate sin], who e.g. mention the expansion of Bosnia in the 10th century to "some" parishes, although these parishes are called Croatian in the DAI, and the source of that expansion is the LJPD, which ends with the Croatian reconquest of Bosnia, but this is not mentioned. Any Croatian quote is systematically deleted. Quoting Fine and his idea of ​​(nameless) Slavs in Bosnia, then christened as Bosnians. Allergic to mentioning that the original Bosnia is only the upper part of the river, every Slav is a Bosnian. Systematic inclusion of a map on the expansion of Bosnia, regardless of fluctuations, or which are the banovinas and the countries around it. --Čeha (razgovor) 03:10, 23 December 2019 (CET)

=
"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # Donji Kraji (23 December 2019 Kafić/Village pump)===== Same story again. Systematic erasure of the Croatian name, citing strange conclusions (eg Roman Pannonia in the upper reaches of the Vrbas, although the area was part of Roman Dalmatia), allergic to any mention of the Croatian-Hungarian kingdom, allergic to any indication of Bosnia's vassal dependence on Croatia (or Hungary), a systematic mythomania about independence and “eternal Bosnia”. And Donji Krajevi, regardless of the fact that it was the border area between the two banovinas as its inalienable part. And which extend to today's BiH border, of course. --Čeha (razgovor) 03:10, 23 December 2019

=
"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # Banovina i kraljevina Bosna (23 December 2019 Kafić/Village pump)===== Kao i gore, isti problemi. Problem sa činjenicom da je Tvrtko preuzeo srpsku krunu vjerojatno na poticaj svog rođaka i suverena h-u kralja, koji je na taj način podupirao širenje svog vazala (a preko njega i svojih ovlasti) na istok, u Srbiju, ali da ta kruna nije priznata i za Bosnu, sve do 1461. kada je papa poslao novu krunu i priznao kraljevinu. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Bosnia Neshvaćanje pojma feudalne srednjovjekovne države, pokušaj pretvaranja u nacionalnu, teža mitomanija, pokušaj pisanja članka na način da je svaka druga riječ Bosna. --Čeha (razgovor) 03:10, 23. prosinca 2019

"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # Usora (23 December 2019 Kafić/Village pump)
Ovdje je to u manjem opsegu, ali opet. Mitomanija o vječitoj Bosni, koja je samo nominalno podložna Ugarskoj (nikako hrvatsko-ugarskoj) državi. Isti korisnik, ista priča.--Čeha (razgovor) 03:10, 23. prosinca 2019

Spilling over into en.wikipedia: help and support acquired through Ceha's solicitation

 * 28 December 2019 Silverije edit in Bosnia (early medieval polity) - 19:21, 28 December 2019

Meatpuppetry: Ivan Gundulić edit-war (not investigated in full for this report)

 * (problematic page, w/t history of extended edit-warring)

Editors who participated in canvassing on Ivan Gundulić article (English and Croatian language wikipedia)
Editors who participated, both at Croatian and English lang. wikipedia, in debates over English language wikipedia article various issues (not investigated in full for this report):

English wikipedia

 * (admin at hr.wikipedia)
 * (admin at hr.wikipedia)

Croatian wikipedia

 * Željko (admin at hr.wikipedia)
 * Željko (admin at hr.wikipedia)

Canvasing evidence (by date):
Following links are evidence of written solicitation at Croatian language wikipedia project (not investigated in full for this report): Kafić, Village pump of hr.wikipedia project:
 * 4 September 2019 Kafić/Village pump "Listing of defects at English wikipedia": Ivan Gundulić (ed.note [prolonged edit war, but canvasing not investigated in full for this report]), by Mateo K 01 (13:15, 4 September 2019), Zeljko (admin at hr.wikipedia) (21:39, 4 September 2019), Silverije (18:04, 4 September 2019), Mateo K 01 (20:58, 4 September 2019);
 * Listing of defects at English wikipedia, with mentioning of articles on en.wikipedia where they felt help was needed, such as Ivan Gundulić (here, where Mateo K 01, Silverije, and another of three most abusive Croatian project's admins, Zeljko, debated from 4 September to 4 October 2019)

=
"Listing of defects at English wikipedia" # Ivan Gundulić (4 September 2019 Kafić/Village pump) (ed.note [prolonged edit war, but canvasing not investigated in full for this report])=====
 * Information that he is Croatian poet is removed, albeit being labeled as such even by Encyclopaedia Britannica‎. --Mateo K 01 (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2019 (ed. note linked diff in original text in Croatian)
 * They are well-known for falsification of everything concerning Croatia. --Zeljko (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2019 (ed. note [nota bene admin at hr.wikipedia])
 * Frowardly the information that he is Croatian poet continues to be removed, albeit Encyclopaedia Britannica reference‎, which, in obvious lack of better and stronger arguments, is now demoted as weak source (ed. note [by User:EdJohnston admin]), with literal explanation that "Britannica doesn't carry much weight as a source" (Britannica nema puno težine kao izvor). So, now you just try to wrap your mind around it... --Silverije (talk) 18:04, 4 September 2019
 * My opinion that en.wiki is rotten system is confirmed. In short: en.wiki is uniquely apocryphal world. I respect every Croatian editor who fights there against all of the manipulation and misinformation. --Mateo K 01 (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2019


 * Documentation: 9, 10, 11

Spilling over into en.wikipedia:
(not investigated in full for this report)

Mikola22

 * registered account on 22 October 2019. Evident from the survey of editor's Talk page and Contribution history, Mikola22 apparently plunged himself into boiling-hot water of controversial subjects from the get-go, focusing his participation on Croatian history and politics, also in regard to Serbs in Croatia, and Bosnian history in general, while, as it appears, following in Ceha's footprints, with somewhat similar behavioral pattern of refusal of consensus and editors' arguments even when others expressed it in unison like here, here and here, where editor also rejecting RS in same manner and with same reasoning, including language expressions, topic interest, while making weird claims that persons like Krunoslav Draganović are real historians, and then even some more complicated tasks such as participation in AN even filing some of their own here, here and on RSN here, here, here


 * [];
 * []; expressing doubts on identity and ethnic origins;
 * [];
 * [] expressing doubts in RS supporting a claim;
 * [] expressing same opinion on "original historical document";
 * [] response regarding RS which sums it up.

It seems highly probable that some sort of close correlation could exist.