User:SapientiaMundus/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Manhattan Project

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I picked this article because the Manhattan Project has been one of my favorite topics we have covered so far.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section - The first sentence is concise but provides a solid amount of info. It is also concise overall but does not include any info that is not needed.

Content - The info is relevant and up to date, and does not have any omissions or unnecessary additions.

Tone and Balance - The article is very neutral and does not really include opinions, rather, it is mostly just fact.

Sources - The links work, all info is cited, as well as they are thorough and current. I can not find any better sources.

Organization - Article is well organized, with a good structure, no spelling errors and is overall well written.

Media - The images have good captions, enhance understanding and all appear to follow Wikipedia's copyright guidelines.

Talk Page - The article is included in 7 WikiProjects, is a featured article, and there are discussions about some captions as well as amending grammatical errors.

Overall - Overall this is a very good article. It is a featured article used in many WikiProjects. It's strengths are its organization and thoroughness. I think that the article could be improved by possibly adding a few more images. Overall, this is a very complete and developed article.