User:SaraParkwood/Creative Commons license/Jimzhen21 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sara Parkwood


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:SaraParkwood/Creative Commons license
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Creative Commons license

Evaluate the drafted changes
A clear structure

The overall sections organized well, and in a sensible order.

Balanced coverage

Each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject, section "Communist Ideologies and Countries" and "Capitalist Ideologies and Countries" have equal length.

The article well reflects the perspectives represented in the published literature, and the author used two different perspectives and compared the two primary philosophies: communism and capitalism on this topic.

Neutral content

I believe the content is neutral. The article discusses this issue from the perspectives of communism and capitalism, and gives contrasts and differences. But after reading, I think the article's position is slightly inclined towards capitalism.

Reliable sources

Most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, and the statements attributed to the different sources evenly.

There is one unsourced statement in the article "The usage of the Creative Commons License has quickly spread to become an international phenomenon. However, because the license was initially developed in line with the American legal system, various Creative Commons jurisdiction ports have evolved to accommodate the various legal, political, and economic systems around the world. The differentiating factors are primarily grounded in two primary philosophies: communism and capitalism."