User:Sarah5261/Akuapem dialect/Hss86 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Inayasingh
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Inayasingh/Carpathian Romani
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Carpathian Romani

Evaluate the drafted changes
lead: Based off of the lead they put together, they were able to make It short and to the point while including the key points on the rubric. They included the main topic in the topic sentence which immediately told me what the main idea of the article would be about. They were able to add more information on the language and how its history connects to other languages as well. I do believe that they did a good job summarizing everything in the lead without adding too much access information.

Content: The content added is all related to the topic as well as up to date based off the bibliography used. The bibliography shows up to the year 2021. However, the sources are not as recent and could be better if there were more used for the article.

Tone/ balance: The tone of the article is not bias and clearly states facts about the language. While reading I am simply learning new facts on the topic without feeling like It is leaning towards one side. The article does not overrepresent any topics and is able to give new information throughout.

Sources and References: The writer used many references and sources that were cited clearly. One thing I would change is making sure there are more current sources that are used. Most of the sources are from previous years and It would be more reliable to use more recent research In the article.

Organization: The article is well organized and put together. I don't feel like I was confused when reading the article and everything was labeled clearly making It easy to find the references and bibliography. I think It will be easier to analyze the organization once there are more parts and information added to the article.

Images and Media: There is a chart in the article the references the different dialects and their subgroups. This was a nice touch to the article because It gives a faster and easier way for the readers to understand the information. The chart helps quickly see the different countries and the dialect used there.

Overall Impressions: Overall I think this article was put together well and was organized perfectly. The only thing I would change is making sure to add more references that are more recent to this year rather than years ago. This could also give moire current information to readers that aren't in those references that were used.