User:SarahDorvil84/Women in the Caribbean/Nicramirez1 Peer Review

Hi Sarah! I enjoyed reading your article. I think it is a great start. I liked how you organized the different sections/categories. This is something that could be helpful to use in my article too. The distinction between Issues and Factors is a great way to keep people's attention and focus on details within each section. The bullet points were a nice way to state the main idea and then explain further.

A suggestion I have is that you should include more sources. Right now, the sections are very Patricia Anderson based and by adding more sources, it would look more reliable. These changes could also improve credibility. Also, I would suggest hyperlinking the sources you are using at the bottom of the page, so that people who are looking at your draft have access to the sources you are using. By letting people have access to these articles, they would be able to see exactly where your information is coming from, as well as, be able to check for plagiarism. My last suggestion is you might want to add goals, benefits, and outcomes for the Women in The Caribbean Project (WICP). After reading about the issues, these things came to mind and made me curious about what else the project is and deals with.

Overall, I think this article has great potential and is a very interesting and important topic to write about. I can't wait to see what you do with it! (:

- Nicole Ramirez