User:Sarah Silberman/Paula Hyman/Mkcharlie32 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Sarah Silberman
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Sarah Silberman/Paula Hyman

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Lead evaluation
seems like it hits all the points that you talked about in the article itself

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? I believe so
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? not that I can tell

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? I believe so
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Sources and references evaluation
Add a source to the end of the third and fourth paragraph of Later Life and Death (especially the latter)

I would move the links for Joseph Salvador and The Dreyfus Affair from the titles of the works in the Various Works section to the Research Interests section (at least the one for the Dreyfus Affair, since it appears first in the Research Interests section)

Also I would make the links to your sources clickable

Potentially add a source for the claim in the lead part about Diner crediting Hyman as the originator of the study of Jewish women's history

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? a couple grammatical errors, mostly just extra or missing spaces between words
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? more information about her accomplishments
 * How can the content added be improved? idk it already seems pretty good to me