User:Sarahamc0714/Forensic psychology/Leanna321 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sarahmc0714


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sarahamc0714/Forensic psychology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Forensic psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think you have made some great additions to the article so far. I like the idea of adding a careers section. I would move the already existing “Salary” section to be underneath the careers section you make, because I kind of felt like the way it was placed in the original article was very random. I think the lead section in your draft has some good points that are left out in the original article. I would say that keeping the most recent or complete definition of forensic psychology at the beginning of the lead would make the introduction much more effective. Then the conflicting definitions could be discussed later on in the article, maybe in the “History” section; but I almost feel like the evolving definitions deserve their own section. I just feel like the lead focuses too much on definitions rather than including all key points of the article. Maybe you could mention of the evaluations and the ethics in the lead to cover more parts of the article.