User:Sarahdanes/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Hemp oil
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead Section: introductory sentence is concise and describes topic, brief description of major sections included - however sections could be labelled more effectively, only essential info included in the lead
 * Content: content and sources referenced seem to be recent and relevant, minimal information is provided, no historical information included, article not on a underrepresented population
 * Tone and Balance: article is neutral and unbiased, many viewpoints underrepresented, only basic information provided, short article, not yet complete
 * Sources and References: some information not cited, some sources used are unreliable and unprofessional - written by random people with no education on the topic and no information available on the internet about them, most sources are thorough, sources are current and reflect current ideas on the topic, sources are diverse and include peer reviewed articles, links are functional
 * Organization and writing quality: article is concise, some parts are repetitive/ poorly worded, sections are organized based on information in the article but the information is minimal and sections can potentially be restructured when more information is added
 * Images and Media: images are relevant but first reference photo can be replaced with one more clearly reflective of the article topic, images in gallery are well captioned, first reference photo not captioned with detail but a basic simple caption is provided, unclear as to whether images adhere to regulations, images laid out in efficient way
 * Talk page discussion: a conversation regarding a disagreement over the article title is present and reflects changes in the article, conversations regarding numbers not properly explained are present, conversations about the neutrality of specific sources are present, conversations regarding the modification of external links are present, article rated as a C-class article by both WikiProjects it is involved in - article is a part of "WikiProject Food and Drink" and "WikiProject Cannabis", Wikipedia provides a more neutral perspective on topics
 * Overall Impressions: article is well written, article provides neutral information, article is sourced by reliable sources for the most part, article is up to date, some sources used are unreliable, some sentences are poorly worded, article could use some revising, issues mentioned in above notes can be revised and attended to, article is just beginning to be developed


 * Sources
 * Raikos, V., Konstantinidi, V., & Duthie, G. (2015). Processing and storage effects on the oxidative stability of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) oil‐in‐water emulsions. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 50(10), 2316–2322. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12896
 * Liang, J., Aachary, A., Hydamaka, A., Eskin, N., Eck, P., & Thiyam‐Holländer, U. (2018). Reduction of Chlorophyll in Cold‐Pressed Hemp (Cannabis sativa) Seed Oil by Ultrasonic Bleaching and Enhancement of Oxidative Stability. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 120(4), 1700349–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201700349
 * Alonso‐Esteban, J., González‐Fernández, M., Fabrikov, D., Torija‐Isasa, E., Sánchez‐Mata, M., & Guil‐Guerrero, J. (2020). Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Varieties: Fatty Acid Profiles and Upgrading of γ‐Linolenic Acid–Containing Hemp Seed Oils. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 122(7), 1900445–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201900445
 * VanDolah, H., Bauer, B., & Mauck, K. (2019). Clinicians’ Guide to Cannabidiol and Hemp Oils. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(9), 1840–1851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.003
 * Radočaj, O., Dimić, E., & Tsao, R. (2014). Effects of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Seed Oil Press‐Cake and Decaffeinated Green Tea Leaves (Camellia sinensis) on Functional Characteristics of Gluten‐Free Crackers. Journal of Food Science, 79(3), C318–C325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12370

Option 2

 * Article title: Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead Section: introductory sentence is clear and concise, articles main sections are summarized in lead section, lead section is detailed but seems to fit as the article consists of a lot of information as well
 * Content: article content is relevant, message appears at the top of the article indicating that it needs to be updated as of 2013, article does not seem to be of a historically underrepresented
 * Tone and Balance: article is neutral, article seems unbiased however message at the top of the article indicates that the article lends undue weight on certain ideas/incidents
 * Sources and References: information is cited, sources cited are reliable and professional, sources are thorough, sources are reasonably current and reflect current information on the article topic, links are functional, sources are diverse
 * Organization and writing quality: article is concise, some parts can be worded more professionally, no visible spelling and grammar errors, article is well organized
 * Images and Media: images are relevant, images are mostly well captioned, the third image shown seems irrelevant and is captioned to make it relate, unclear as to whether images adhere to regulations, images laid out efficiently
 * Talk page discussion: previous dead links have been fixed, past discussions regarding the accuracy of cannabis related information are present, discussions regarding finding more relevant photos is present, article rated as a C-class article by the "WikiProject Cannabis", compared to regular discussions wikipedia talk pages provide a more neutral perspective on the article topic
 * Overall Impressions: Article can be updated with new information on the topic, the third image shown can be changed to a more relevant one, overall a well written article


 * Sources:
 * James H. Mills. (2016). The IHO as Actor The case of cannabis and the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961. Hygiea Internationalis: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the History of Public Health, 13(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.3384/hygiea.1403-8668.1613195
 * Zitt, R. (2016). Should I stay or should I go? Why Bolivian tactics and U.S. “flexibility” undermine the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 42(1), 525–.
 * Taylor, A. (2007). Addressing the Global Tragedy of Needless Pain: Rethinking the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(4), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00180.x
 * Bewley-Taylor, D., & Jelsma, M. (2011). Regime change: Re-visiting the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 23(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.08.003
 * Sabet, K. (2011). Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. In Encyclopedia of Drug Policy: “The War on Drugs” Past, Present, and Future (Vol. 2, pp. 724–726).

Option 3

 * Article title: Plantibody
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead Section: introductory sentence is concise, can be more clear as the article is titled "plantibody" while the introductory sentence speaks about passive immunization (it is unclear as to whether these are synonyms), articles main sections are summarized in lead section, lead is concise and not overly detailed
 * Content: article content is relevant, article content is up to date, no content is missing but the article is fairly short, article not relevant to an equity gap
 * Tone and Balance: article has a section for advantages but disadvantages are not mentioned, written from the perspective that plantibodies are better than antibodies, article is written in a biased way, article seems to push the reader into forming an specific opinion instead of being purely informative
 * Sources and References: not all facts are cited, sources are thorough and current, last source does not lead anywhere (link does not work), sources are diverse
 * Organization and writing quality: article is well written but still in the beginning stages, grammar and spelling mistakes are present, writing is concise and organized but unclear at times
 * Images and Media: no images are present
 * Talk page discussion: no discussion on talk page, article rated as stub-class by the two WikiProjects it is involved in - article is a part of "WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology" and "WikiProject Plants"
 * Overall Impressions: Article is concise and organized, article is still in beginning stages, article needs to be edited to remove bias and add information, spelling and grammar mistakes need to be fixed, last link in sources does not lead anywhere and needs to be removed


 * Sources:
 * Plantibodies. (2014). Indian Journal of Dental Advancements, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5866/2014.621543 Stoger, E., Sack, M., Fischer, R., & Christou, P. (2002). Plantibodies: applications, advantages and bottlenecks. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 13(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00303-8  plantibody. (2006). In Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.  Oluwayelu, D., & Adebiyi, A. (2016). Plantibodies in human and animal health: a review. African Health Sciences, 16(2), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v16i2.35  Nickel, H., Kawchuk, L., Twyman, R., Zimmermann, S., Junghans, H., Winter, S., Fischer, R., & Prüfer, D. (2008). Plantibody-mediated inhibition of the Potato leafroll virus P1 protein reduces virus accumulation. Virus Research, 136(1), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2008.05.001