User:Sarahlujoseph/Rabies virus/MatthewBroadway Peer Review


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? I think the article give all the good information you need to know about the Rabies virus. Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I liked how you listed the symptoms and went into detail about them not just a short sentence. Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? The first symptoms of rabies may be very similar to those of the flu, including general weakness or discomfort, fever, or headache. Maybe try to go into detail about what rabies is and what it looks like also physically.
 * 2) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? I would try to add pictures and other things around the article to help it look more visually pleasing. Why would those changes be an improvement? Try to have the text unboled because half is bolded and the other half is not and it makes it look a little awkward.
 * 3) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Try to make it look better with pictures and charts maybe to help make people want to read it.
 * 4) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! I will try to do the symptoms like you and go into more detail about them

General info
(Matthew Broadway)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)