User:Sarahlujoseph/Rabies virus/Shayna F Peer Review

General info
User: Sarahlujoseph
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Sarahlujoseph/Rabies virus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Rabies virus

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead and content/organization:

The leads represents the subject, is too the point, and has a good introduction into the article and into the writing. The content good, relevant, and interesting information that really adds to the article. It relates to parts of the original article leads into other section already written, but depending on where new sections are being placed, you might have to define/connect some vocabulary that are not already established for the reader.

Tone and Balance:

The tone is neutral and consistent throughout the writing. It is not biased to one idea or belief and brings an academic feeling towards the writing.

Sources and references:

It might be helpful to pick some more recent source, if that is possible. But all sources and references relate to what is being written about and connect information in the daft.

Overall impressions:

It has amazing writing and detail over the information. It adds towards the article and expands nicely on the sections. The content good, relevant, and interesting information and goes well with what is already written. It would be helpful for the reader if some definition to some scientific terms were added, depending on where you are placing the new section, some words might of already been defined or need to be expanded on. But overall, this was an amazing read and it is a stunning job.