User:Sarahr26/Dogs of Roman Britain/Ameliamduncan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sarahr26


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sarahr26/Dogs of Roman Britain


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dogs of Roman Britain

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Sarah!

First off, let me just say I LOVE how unique this idea is, and I love that you have decided to undertake an entirely new article on this topic!

The structure is really well done and flows really nicely, I also really like the way you have chosen to break it down.

The writing style maintains neutrality throughout which as we know is super important here and your sources are very strong for a topic that one would normally think there may not be much research on.

There are only a couple areas I would recommend you look at further. One being the citing requirements for how often you should cite a source in a wikipedia article. I know for some referencing styles, citations only have to occur once in the paragraph, but for some they prefer citations to happen whenever information is used. There are a couple sections in your article where a couple of sentences go by with one citation, like the hunting section, the first sentence is pretty specific but does not have a source. The second thing that I expect you will get to when we get to that part on the timeline is adding pictures because I am so curious as to what the art depicting them looks like and a more visual representation of how the people of Roman Britain may have appreciated dogs differently than we do now!

Great work! I look forward to how your article turns out in the end! :)