User:Sarahsgoh/Raquel Sanchez/Maryks Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sarahsgoh


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sarahsgoh/Raquel_Sanchez?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead looks great. It's concise but it encompasses the main sections of the article and gives a good overview of Sanchez's career and accomplishments. Some minor recommendations would be to capitalize "Brain Cancer Program" if that's the name of the program, and add a link to it's website. I would also link some of the other mentions; Association of Latino Professionals, Education Across Borders.

Content, organization: The content represents Sanchez well and is a good reflection of the sources and literature available about her. The organization of the sections makes sense and I enjoy how each section is written chronologically, it gives the article a very nice flow. One thing I think could be clarified or elaborated on is the "brain cancer program at Memorial Sloan". I'm not sure exactly what program this is referring to at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and since it's mentioned in the lead as "world-renowed" I thought it would be more substantial in the article. More information on this program would definitely be good to add.

Sources and Tone/balance: The references are all reliable secondary sources, and they are a good and diverse representation of what is currently published on Sanchez. I did notice that in some places, the writing is very similar to the source that's referenced, like the sentence introducing Opt-In, for example. I'd recommend checking the paraphrasing more closely to avoid accidental plagiarism. The writing itself is very neutral, accurately represents the sources used, and is cited very clearly.

Media, infoboxes and overall impressions: The use of the infobox very nicely summarizes what's in the article, specifically the "known for" bit. The image of Fred Hutch and the table for awards helps to break up the text, but I recommend adding links to the institutions of the Awards. I'd also add external links to things like "Opt-In" and "brain tumor center", and some links relevant to the science (like "oncology" and "cancer") just to make it easier for the reader to learn about what she does. Overall, the article accurately and thoroughly describes Sanchez's work and achievements throughout her early education and career. The information is presented in a way that's easy to read and navigate, and definitely highlights the work of this uncommon leader!