User:Sarahwhitelaw/Cuban Spanish/Damianperea31 Peer Review

General info
Damian - Damianperea31
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sarahwhitelaw/Cuban Spanish
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cuban Spanish

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, there is great information added to the Phonoly sections that shows more of the differences between Cuban spanish and other Spanish varieties. However, I think it would be a good idea to add some information on how Cuban and Caribbean Spanish differ. For example, who speaks each variety? Where is each variety spoken?

Tone and Balance


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Yes, there seems a lot more information used from 2 sources compared to the rest. I see that the Schwegler and Terrell sources are referenced many times throughout the article, but the rest of the sources in your bibliography are not. Maybe you can use information from those unused sources to back up the information that has no citations?

Sources and Reference


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? There seems to be a lot of information that has been added with no citations. And the ones that are seem to get information from only half your bibliography. Adding citations, if they are needed, would help make it clear where the infomration is coming from.


 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? I think that you did a great job of putting the information from your sources into your own words while accurately conveying for information. For example, the information on neutralizing liquid consonants was easy to read and still taught the same idea Alfaraz wrote about.

Organization


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the information is well organized. Each section comparing Cuban to a different relevent Spanish variety, with the final section talking about unique feature to Cuban Spanish.

Overall Impressions

'''
 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I think it has greatly expanded on the phonetic differences of Cuban Spanish and other related dialects. The information is easy enough to read and is very well organized
 * How can the content added be improved? The information added is great and well written, but there seems to be alot of missing citations. In addition, the sources seem to not be equally used. Perhaps adding citations will show that all sources are being used equally. If not, would it be possible to use those sources to back up information that has no citations? Or could they be used to back up information already found in the articles? Another minor change I would recomment is adding who and where Cuban and Caribbean Spanish is spoken because it seems both are spoken in Cuba. '''