User:Sarefo

hi, i've been working on spider systematics for a while, although at the moment i'm not very active. I created the page Spider families as a (temporary?) entry point, and worked on getting the 111 families up to a certain standard. My favorites are jumping spiders, where I created a page for every described recent genus. I also created and maintain Category:Lists of spider species to help people get an overview of what's still to do ;)


 * some pictures i uploaded can be found at the commons.
 * i also did some work on lojban at the english wiktionary

Workspace

 * User:Sarefo/Templates
 * User:Sarefo/Sandbox1

useful links

 * Template messages

Todo

 * todo ;)


 * Spider predators


 * Psychodinae


 * Delia species list


 * salticid subfamilies (maybe enhance List of Salticidae genera)


 * Eugaster spinulosa


 * list of fossil spiders (from joel hallan's biology catalog)


 * merge Archaeidae and Assassin spider


 * tear-drinking moths: Hemiceratoides hieroglyphica, Mecistoptera griseifusa, etc.


 * Pardosa species that have pictures in commons (at least)
 * Pirata (spider)
 * Frontinella
 * Sitticus floricola


 * list of termite species, + pages


 * mine Psyche for texts and pictures.
 * done: Araneae 1957-1967
 * todo: Araneae up to 1956, 1968-2000, other animals ;)


 * upload pictures from Lindsey + Starr.
 * add contact info to lindsey pics up to lichen.


 * suggestions for range maps
 * hard edges -> easier to re-color


 * pages needed


 * pages needing extension


 * created/ significantly expanded pages

Links to PDF archives

 * Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 1928-2006 (southeast Asia)

Users

 * User:Olei
 * User:Aka
 * commons:User:Fabelfroh (mosses)
 * User:Fir0002 (nice pics)

Taxonomy pages

 * Amphibian species of the World database

A thought on grading categorisation
Hi Sarefo. You were suggested as someone to contact regarding the I'm a fellow contributor to WikiProjects Arthropods. I was wondering if it would be possible to modify the statistics script so that the statistics table includes links within cells, allowing one to select articles of a given quality and importance (to make it easier to prioritise articles to work on). Asking around elsewhere pointed me to the Geology version. It seems they have additional categories - so an article wouldn't be "Category:FA-Quality Arthropods articles" and "Category: Low-Importance Arthropods arcticles", but rather (or as well) be "Category:FA-Quality Low-Importance Arthropods arcticles".

I don't want to create too much work, but this seems to me to possibly be a better approach, allowing users to go straight to high importance stubs to work on, for example, rather than getting a list of all the stubs and manually looking for high importance ones of them (based on a view that importance should prioritise activity).

Grateful for your thoughts. Heds (talk) 03:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)