User:Sarvesh Nyachhyon/Evaluate an Article

Article Link: 2017 UEFA Europa League Final

Evaluating content


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

- The information in the main article does have information of the clubs that are playing the Final which is Ajax and Manchester United. There is past club informations about the winners and the score of the 2017 Europa League Final. There was no distraction because the extra information and past team data of the cup layout was something that always provides more context for the soccer fans.


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

- The information shared on the main article is not out of date. The talk page article is not out of date because it was a 2017 dated soccer game. Information related to what actually happened in the Europa League Final Game between Manchester United and Ajax could be shared, the name of the both competing teams were missing, the winner of the final should be added, the goal scorers, and any other game related statistics could be added (Talk Page relation). The main article has clear details in a well structured way which shares team, venue, background, road to the final, pre-match, match info, and sources. There is nothing missing in my view looking at the main article.

Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?

- There are no notable equity gaps in this article the information is shared equally and the data is accurate in relation to the final game. The team names are correct, the statistics of both team is shared, the context of the cup is shared, and the photos/sources are correct so there is no underrepresentation on this sports article.


 * What else could be improved?

- If there could be team photos shared that would make it better, but that is only my personal view so that the readers can have some visual understanding of the setting and player dynamics.

Evaluating Tone


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

- The article was neutral. There are no claims that are biased, this provides straight forward easy to understand sentences that provides direct information.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

- Most of the viewpoints are informative and just what the article needs.

Evaluating Sources


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

- The link works and the sources shared backup the article information. UEFA is the official organization for the final and the article matches statistics and news from the full report link which makes this article a credible one.


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

- The references are appropriate and reliable because the links used are from official sites such as UEFA, Guardian, and Union of European Football Association. The sources are neutral and share only accurate statistics and events in the game.

Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?

- The sources are different authors and trusted publications that have rights to the game and cup organization.

Checking talk page


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

- None in relation to this specific article but some other articles are present where there is talk of the final.


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

- The article is rated C and low quality. It is part of WikiProject Football.


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

- This does not have a proper outline, not enough details and context of the topic, and not any trusted editors or citations are present which overall is not beneficial for the readers.Article Link: Talk:2017 UEFA Europa League Final

Evaluating content


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

- The information in the article is not accurate and not informative in relation to the 2017 UEFA Europa League Final. The lack of introduction and information clarity distracted me, if there was a proper outline in relation to what the teams were, players that were part of the game, stars to watch, or any statistics of the game it would be more beneficial.


 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?

- There are no notable equity gaps in this article simply because there is not much information present in the first place.


 * What else could be improved?

- There can be some information of the stadium the game was hosted in, the managers information, add some pictures for context, and referee officials information would make the article more complete and with reference would make it trustworthy.

Evaluating Tone


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

- The article has only shared information related to Ajax Club and it's kit predictions which shows some relation towards alienation of Manchester United information.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

- Most of the viewpoints lack of information so I would say it is underrepresented.

Evaluating Sources


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

- The link works but the sources are not related to the article.


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

- There are no references that are appropriate and related to the information shared. The information comes from Spurs fans and other football related fans.


 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?

- The sources are different authors but not any well known or highly rated ones.

Checking talk page


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

- None in relation to this specific article but some other articles are present where there is talk of the final.


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

- The article is rated C and low quality. It is part of WikiProject Football.


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

- This does not have a proper outline, not enough details and context of the topic, and not any trusted editors or citations are present which overall is not beneficial for the readers.