User:Sarvesh Nyachhyon/Influencer marketing/Cooper0014 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sarvesh Nyachhyon


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sarvesh%20Nyachhyon/Influencer_marketing?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Influencer marketing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:

The content that is added to the article is relevant to the overall topic, the content is very factual and does not have any address towards equity gaps. The content given is good in quality but limited in quantity. The content just leaves a lot to be desired, I think that you could expand more on all of these ideas that you have.

Tone and Balance:

The contribution is very balanced, there is not much bias or perspective to speak of, the information given is purely factual from my point of view. There is no attempt to persuade in one way or another the contribution is informative.

Sources and References:

All of the sources are from either academic journals or relevant sources providing needed data, all of the sources are reliable. The sources are current and the given information is reflective of what is provided in the sources themselves. The sources are from a diverse group of people who's diversity contributes different perspectives to the topic. These sources are not in need of being replaced. I could not get the links to the sources to work, I think that I'm just not trying to access them the right way, regardless it was hard for me to get to the sources.

Organization:

There are no grammatical errors and the writing is easily understood. I think that what is provided will fit in well with the rest of the article.

Overall Impressions:

I thought that this was a good start to a contribution, there is still a lot more expanding that could be done with each section added. You could do things like describing an idea more or giving a real world example to add depth to these base ideas that you have. I think that just continuing to elaborate on what you have will make this a really strong contribution. You could stand to have more sources but that will come with more writing. You do not address any equity gaps, but I feel that is okay when you are giving more factual information than anything. On the whole I think this is a good job.