User:Sas007ucsd/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Forensic Psychology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
My friend always talks about his major (forensic science). So the article name caught my eye.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The tone of the article is strictly informative.

Everything is very well organized and placed for higher readability. Nothing is distracting, rather it boosts focus.

I dont know much about the topic but it seems like it does not miss important history markers, it also lists then in a chronological way so that a timiline is created within the article.

The article does not talk about any race explicitly, so this would make me think that it might be implicitly biased towards one race.

The article is neutral. It appears to state facts over ideas or thoughts.

The citations are all functional. But some do not fully describe what the author was trying to paraphrase. Maybe the author tries to overthink and the paraphrase became too complicated for a simple worded article.

The talk is mostly about the citations and how they can be better organized for more readability.

The talk is more professional than our class talks.