User:Sasharoach/User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)/Sasharoach Peer Review

General info
Isdewell
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * n/a:

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The lead has been updated to reflect the new content
 * The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic
 * The lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections
 * The lead does not include information that is not present in the article
 * The lead is concise and not overly detailed

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is relevant to the topic
 * The content added is up-to-date
 * There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong
 * The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps or addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is neutral
 * There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position
 * There are not viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented
 * The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information
 * The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say
 * The sources are thorough - i.e. they reflect the available literature on the topic
 * The sources are current
 * The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors and include historically marginalized individuals where possible- though only two sources
 * There are not better sources available- the book provides comprehensive information and touches on all subjects related to the cafe
 * Links work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Content added is well-written - i.e. It is concise, clear, and easy to read
 * The content added does not contain grammatical or spelling errors
 * The content added is well-organized - i.e It is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * The article does not include images that enhance understanding of the topic
 * Images are not well captioned- no images
 * Images do not adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations- no images
 * Images are not laid out in a visual way- no images

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * The article meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. It is supported by 2 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject
 * The list of sources is not greatly exhaustive- there are only two, however the book is the best source for this topic and contains an influx of information
 * The article follows the patterns of other similar articles
 * The article links to other articles

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The content added has made it more complete- especially since this is a new article so all content is new on Wikipedia
 * Strengths: Organized, thorough, links to other articles and sources
 * Content can be improved by adding images to make it more interesting and visually appealing