User:Sashi9/Evaluate an Article

Lead Section
The content in the lead is relevant with a neutral tone. It provides a good general overview for the topic and the details of the article. The sources are reliable and current. The lead section also uses links to other Wikipedia articles to expand on topics and people that may be unfamiliar to the reader.

Haydn, Mozart, and the classical style
This section includes many examples to illustrate the content, including images and audio files that are well-captioned and appropriately cited. It also has many links to other Wikipedia articles in addition to properly cited sources. The tone of this section remains neutral. I was wondering if the titles need to be capitalized, but the current format is consistent with the rest of the article.

This section initially seemed overwhelming with the amount of information, but it made sense after reading it. All the information flowed nicely together to create an overarching narrative.

The article seems well-developed with a detailed talk page. It has not been updated in a while, but that is appropriate for this topic.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)