User:Sasoroma1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Alligator leather

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Because it is one of the C class articles so it will need improvement. Also, it was interesting article because the alligator leather is in demand and expensive so I want to know the effect of hunting alligators on their habitat and the environment.

Evaluate the article. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)
The lead has an introductory section and it is concise but it does not have a description for all the major sections like health complications and environmental impact. The article content is partially relevant because the lead nothing mentioned about the major side effects of tanning. Also, I think that more information should be added like tanning the leather in another country and the effect on the crocodile habitat due to hunting. I think the article is unbalanced because the claim about the negative environmental and health impact of tanning is addressed in the last two sections while there is no claim for safer tanning process or another country is done the same process and avoided these major health complications. I think the article is persuading the reader to avoid crocodile leather. The article is clear, easy to read and concise. Also, It is broken to section. In the talk page they suggested moving the health complication and environmental impact to another articles but I disagree because the readers should know about these side effects and benefits of using crocodile leather. " According to a report in 2001 estimate" in the last section I was not able to find who wrote that report or where is the report, so I think this part could be improved. I found 2 sources from news blog.