User:Satvikreddyvoladri/sandbox

Wie Conferencia Introduction

WIE_CONFERENCIA logo which resembles women empowerment in technology CONFERENCIA was started as a small intra college 2-day debate event in the year 2011 by a small group of people in Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology. Later the event was closed for almost 5 years due to inactivity and was re born in the year 2017 as a 3-day event under IEEE-WIE wing of Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology by a that present board of council-IEEE-SNIST. The event was refurbished to a new level which was turned out to be a diplomatic debate and conference with agendas concentrating on Women in Engineering all around the globe. IEEE-SNIST [1] IEEE-SNIST( Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology) is a student board of IEEE[2] region 10[3] in Hyderabad which is an active technical student organization. It was started by the director of the college Dr Narasimha Reddy in the year 2000 to give student a global exposure of technological developments. From the past 18 years it has grown to heights where it got the best student branch award in the year 2018 and conducted many prestigious events which were nationally recognized. IEEE WIE-SNIST

This is the official logo for IEEE-SNIST WIE(Women in Engineering) is one of the active wing working under IEEE-SNIST which has the main moto to take engineering to the maximum extent and encourage women to get into global market of engineering. It has many volunteer events like teaching and taking career development classes in rural areas of the state and enlightening them about engineering. One of the most prestigious event of IEEE-SNIST is under this wing which is named WIE-CONFERENCIA. History Wie-Conferencia was first founded by the board members of IEEE-SNIST in the year 2011 as a intra college 2 day debate. Later due to time and situation constraints the event was shutdown for nearly 5 years. The event was again retaken into consideration by the board members of the year 2017 but with a fresh ideology which targets mainly on global situations of women in technology and their rights. The event was named after the original one as WIE-CONFERENCIA 1.0 Wie-Conferencia 1.0 The reborn Wie-Conferencia was planned again with Satvik Reddy Voladri[4] as the first Secretary General with a active team of 20 members who turned that event to a 3 day national diplomatic conference which was planned to mock the international global conference of women and Indian Rajyasabha, it was a huge hit with approx 250 delegates from various states of India. It was held in July 14th to 16th in Hotel Katriya, Hyderabad,India. The Conference was been devided into 2 major houses as follows Global Women Council (mock) Rajya Sabha (mock) Two Houses was having their respective agendas to discuss Women Empowerment as requisite to achieving sustainable development goal 5 with special emphasis on societal issues and male support. The Women reservation bill 2008 - revisiting challenges and recommended changes After Satvik Reddy the responsibilities of Secretary General was given to Gourav Daula who was even selected as chair for IEEE-SNIST and the legacy of Conferencia was started with the planning of second edition. Wie-Conferencia 2.0 The second edition was held on July 20th to 22nd in Hotel Green park, Hyderabad,India with the same structure and have their own set of proceedings and new mock houses in the conference which were Global Women Council European Inter Governmental panel Lok Sabha The three day conference was held with the agendas about Deliberating over the concept of universal equal wages in white collar environments[5]. Integration of Non-European immigrant women into the workforce.[6] Reviewing the existing legislation regulating workplace environment for women. Discussing the criminal law amendment act (2013) in lieu of Justice Verma's recommendations.[7] Rules and Proceedings Roll call and acknowledgements Roll call is nothing but simple attendance to know the presence of delegates in the committee. Delegates will have two options to respond with : Voting and Observing. Delegates who respond with voting will have a chance to vote on all the directives and substantial motions. Delegates who respond with observing cannot vote on the directives and other substantial motions. They can only be a part of the substantial discussion and vote upon certain procedural motions. Delegates who respond with observing can change their choice from observing to voting, but whereas the delegates who respond with voting cannot. Setting the agenda Every delegate or bloc of delegates gives a list of 7 sub-agendas. The distinct ones are read out by the EB and the others note down these sub-agendas. Once all the distinct sub-agendas are read out, a 10 minute lobbying session is issued at the discretion of the EB. Delegates can discuss and merge their topics with others make a redefined list of sub-agendas. During this session, delegates need to submit the list of 7 sub-agendas again. They can be original or updated lists. Lists will be accepted on first come first serve basis. These lists must also prioritize the 7 sub-agendas. The first sub-agenda in the list will be discussed first. Then voting on the list of sub-agendas will be done. The first list to achieve a simple majority will be selected and the remaining will not be voted upon. After the selection of the list of sub-agendas, the Executive Board may entertain motions for setting the speakers time which must be a minimum of 30 seconds and not more than 180 seconds. Discussion of sub-agendas The discussion will be parliamentary styled. The discussion shall proceed on an agenda to agenda basis. Speakers can speak only after everyone has spoken or when there are no speakers on the floor. After all the 7 sub-agendas are dealt with, an open discussion for a time period of 10 or more minutes is allowed at the discretion of the EB. After the open discussion, the EB asks if there are any other sub-agendas to be placed on the floor. If there are any other sub-agendas, the same process as above is repeated. If there aren't any, a delegate has to raise a motion to close debate and move into documentation. A minimum of 2 hours is required for documentation, therefore if the EB feels all the 7 agendas will not be addressed with the minimum time remaining, they can force the number of agendas to be reduced or forcefully push the committee into documentation based on the directives that it has presented. Submission of directives The next sub-agenda can only be considered once the directive for the on-going sub-agenda is submitted to the EB. After the sub-agenda has been completely discussed, a motion may be raised for a lobbying session with a maximum time period of 20 minutes. It may be extended by a maximum of 10 minutes at the discretion of the executive board. During this session, delegates must document the directives with no particular format. A directive is only approved only if more than half of the delegates in the committee sign the directive as signatories. There is no discussion of the directive. It’s just read out by the authors to the whole committee. There can be more than one directive for a sub-agenda. If there are more than one directives, there is no voting procedure to select a directive, the one with maximum number of signatories will be passed.

Types of Motions
 * THE PAGE IS UNDER DEVELOPMENT*********

"HOME - IEEE-SNIST". sites.ieee.org. Retrieved 2019-02-26.

"Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers", Wikipedia, 2019-02-26, retrieved 2019-02-26

"IEEE". IEEE. Retrieved 2019-02-26.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/satvik-reddy-voladri-562b0a17b

Payne, R.L. (1984). "Geographic Names Information System users guide". Open-File Report. doi:10.3133/ofr84551. ISSN 2331-1258.

Payne, R.L. (1984). "Geographic Names Information System users guide". Open-File Report. doi:10.3133/ofr84551. ISSN 2331-1258.

Payne, R.L. (1984). "Geographic Names Information System users guide". Open-File Report. doi:10.3133/ofr84551. ISSN 2331-1258.