User:SaveTheTrees365/Climate Gentrification/Climatecrisis1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think your lead is good and introduces the topic well and gives a good history to give the reader more information about the topic. Your content is good, you provide both causes and effects and link it all to a case study to bring it all together. However, I think your section header "Case Study (Little Haiti)" could be re worded, but that's not a huge deal. I think your content is very neutral and balanced, you list some solutions, but you do not say which is the best, which is good. Your conclusion also seems good because you aren't trying to convince the reader of anything. I noticed you used Wikipedia as one of your sources which I don't think is super reliable, but in the context it is being used, it seems ok. I think the article is well written and is clear and concise. There are not images and I think adding some maybe about the use study would really enhance the page. Overall, I think the article is good and is going to come together really well.