User:Sawadoky/User:Sawadoky/sandbox/UCstudent2023 Peer Review

General info
Sawadoky Yasmina
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User: Sawadoky/sandbox - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead in

 * The article did well at giving a general overview of aliens or possible life outside of earth for people who might not know much about this topic. Something in the article that impressed me was the last sentence that said there has been life everywhere discovered so far so live in space isn't surprising. I think this really helped the reader understand just how likely and possible that life in space really is. I noticed some punctuation errors in the article, I would suggest the author fixes that. The most important thing the author can do to improve the article would be to fix the punctuation errors. From reading this article I realized that I need to include a sentence in my article that explains the benefits of marine mammal captivity because most of mine are why they are bad.

lead section

 * I feel pretty satisfied that I know the importance of the topic, I know just from reading this article that there is a super high chance there is life in space and that people are working on trying to find it. The lead does reflect the rest of the article properly. The lead could have a little more overview in it and not just facts, so the reader starts off knowing what the article is about. The sections of the article are in a sensible order.

Structure

 * I think the sections are proper length for their importance, the main chunk is alien sightings and there is a lot of facts to back that up vs. the evidence part is short because there is little to no evidence.

Neutral content

 * I could kind of tell from reading the article that the author does believe there is live in space but that is what the article is about so that makes sense, but they could add in some information about articles saying there is no life in space.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)