User:Sawyerbrady44/Survivor guilt/Michellevp16 Peer Review

General info
Sawyerbrady44
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Sawyerbrady44/Survivor guilt
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Survivor guilt

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Overall, the lead is clear, concise, and informative. The lead is allows the reader to get a good, broad understanding of the topic. I would recommend touching on major sections in the lead even if it is just a sentence or two. For example, the lead could touch on the history. The lead does a good job at presenting information that will be touched on later.

Content and Source/References

As to the content of the article, the article is clearly well structured. The article does seem up to date with a good mix of older and up to date information. I would recommend adding a section for "recent developments". I would recommend adding the section only if there are enough current, reliable, and valid articles. By doing this, the article would greatly benefit especially since the article is on the shorter side. Additionally, the reader could get a more current view on survivor guilt like treatments and overall up to date therapies. As for the proposed comments in the sandbox on PTSD, I believe would greatly benefit and improve the quality of the article.

Tone and Balance

Overall, the article is neutral. The articles claims do not appear biased. Additionally, the article does not have a particular viewpoint. The content of the article provides the reader with a neutral stand point.

Organization

As previously mentioned, the article is well structured and clearly presented. I do not see any major grammar or spelling issues. Nonetheless, I would recommend looking in more detail. The article is in great structure.

Images and Media

Although images are not essential, I believe this article could possible benefit from some images in the lead and examples section.

Overall, the comments in the sandbox would greatly benefit and improve the quality of the article. I would recommend taking my suggestions in account. I strongly encourage the user to review any grammar and wording in order to strengthen the article especially since the article is not too lengthy.