User:Sbondurant/Bernice Eddy/Charliehojjat Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Sbondurant


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Sbondurant/Bernice Eddy


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bernice Eddy

Evaluate the drafted changes
The organization seems to be good, the section labeled "Early studies" that you added is nice and fitting with the rest of the article. Additionally, the lead section is good, your sources are cited completely and accurately. Article is written from a neutral point of view, no evidence of bias or leading towards one side. I would try to add more content to get to the required word count. Overall, content is clear, concise, and informative. I would also try to add more images.