User:Sbondurant/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Richard Levins

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am interested in the natural sciences, so I kept narrowing down categories until I reached a page with names and just randomly picked a name until I saw an article that I thought could be evaluated easily.

Evaluate the article
The article about Richard Levins starts out strong with a good, detailed lead section. It describes the article within the first sentence nicely. It is not over detailed, but contains the right amount of information. The content is very relevant to the topic, which is sort of a biography of Richard Levins. It is also up to date. However, it does not adress the equity gap too much. The sources in this article are all up to date and placed perfectly. Each section has at least one citation. The link work on the citation. The content was easy to read, well thought out, and put in a good order. The images in this article are well captioned, average quality, and plenty to show the meaning of the article. Overall, this is a good article that fits all of the guidelines of wiki's article.