User:Sburad2002/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Basal cell

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This topic is talked about very vaguely, it could be interesting to find and learn more about basal cells. The article I picked is very short with a few pictures with improper legends. The article needs to be worked on through many aspects.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section:

I feel that the article does not precisely talk about what a basal cell is, but just gives a very very broad brief intro to what the basic definition is. The Lead section is just two sentences.

Content:

The article does not provide with a lot of content except where basal cells are found and just lists the where they are found. It needs to be updated.

Tone and Balance:

The article is too short to determine if the topic is biased. The article is very underrepresented.

References:

There are no references cited, hence the article is incomplete and very vague.

Images:There are only two pictures in the article and they also have improper legends that do not explain much.