User:ScanianMadness/Trail of Broken Treaties/IwearHat$ Peer Review

The beginning paragraph does a great job of leading the reader to the topic of what the author is discussing. The content seems relevant to the topic, but there are only 2 points completed out of 11. The content is neutral. The sources added have links that take you to the website. At the same time the author should provide more context to the link, like "according to". The content is easy to read, but there is not a lot of content available. The article does not provide images. The content added did not add much to the article, this is a rough draft of what the author will add, but I would elaborate on the points more.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)