User:ScarletFox 13/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Modern Greek architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article mostly because I have always been interested in Greek art and architecture and was curious to learn about what modern day Greek architecture looks like. I think it is important to see how architectural styles evolve over time. My initial impression of this article is that while it has what seems like a good start, it is clearly in need of much more work.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead is short and concise and has an introductory sentence but the article does not really expand on the information in this section. The lead also does not contain descriptions of each section of the article. The content of the article feels random and disparate. Despite the article being quite short, I had a hard time understanding the information within it. There is clearly a lot of missing information in the article and the information that is there needs to be expanded on and made more coherent. The writing does come across as neutral. There seems to be good information but there is no logical organization that ties the information together in a way that makes sense. There is only one source listed for this article and the citation lacks essential information to be able to find the source material. There are many images on this page that have captions but do not do much to enhance the understanding of the information in the article. There are no conversations on the talk page for this article. Overall I feel that this article so far is poorly developed, there is a lot of missing information, no reliable sources, and the writing needs to be more cohesive.