User:Scarpy/Co-Dependents Anonymous

This paper examines the occurrence of codependency in a college-age population. The association between various measures of codependency is investigated in a sample of 165 college students. Almost 50% of our university subjects were familiar with the term codependency. Most of the respondents were categorized as being at the "High Middle" level of codependency. There was no significant difference in the level of codependency between age and ethnic groups. Contrary to expectations, a higher proportion of males was classified in the two highest categories of codependency. A small correlation was found between scores on the Codependency Self-Inventory Scale and codependency measured by the characteristics of the students' significant relationships. The implications for counseling college students are considered.

One of the only attempts to investigate codependency in a college population was reported by Hewes and Janikowski (1998). Using a sample of 76 female undergraduates...

Janet Woititz, a leading author of books on adult children of alcoholics, notes that in recent years the appeal of these ideas was extended to those who grew up in families in which a range of compulsive behaviors or chronic problems other than alcoholism dominated family life (Woititz 1983). In response, Co-dependents Anonymous was formed in the early 1980s, serving individuals who do not have a family history of alcoholism but who identify with the codependence syndrome.

Codependence is described in the literature as a disease that originates in "dysfunctional" families, where children come to overcompensate for parental inadequacies and develop an excessive sensitivity to the needs of others. The concept of the dysfunctional family, which originally referred to patterns of interaction associated with alcoholism, has gradually expanded to incorprate all family systems based on "denial" or "shame-based rules" and includes a wide rande of pathogenic dynamis and impoverished emotional interaction within the family, particular where avoidance of confrontation or inability to resolve conflict predominates. Clinical terms such as "enmeshment" and "blurred ego boundaries" pepper thie literature. The prototypical experience of the adult child is described as "not knowing what normal is," or suffering from a sense of confusion and deprivation that persists into adulthood as an anguished desire to recover something that was emotionally missing in childhood.

Woititz, Janet Geringer. 1983. Adult Children of Alcoholics. Pompano Beach, Fla.: Health Communications.

This article will explore why so many women, and most recently men, have been diagnosing themselves as codependent. It will be suggested that defining codependency as learned helplessness can provide the needed conceptual base to empower those codependents who are also seeking treatment. Empowerment is needed by those women and men who grew up in the types of dysfunctional families that offer them little protection from dysfunctional family rules. The alcoholic family will be explored as one of the family systems which generates large numbers of those feeling that they are codependent. Treatment guidelines will be offered for working with codependents who also decide on a course of psychotherapy.

"Liberation psychotherapy"

IT is than suprising that, of the 547 members of Co-Dependents Anonymous groups (on oth the East and West Coasts and in the Midwest) that I encountered in the course of my research, virtually all of them were white baby boomers.

Without the new theory of addictio nand the concept of process addiction, there would have been no co-dependency movement. Through the analogy that the discourse established between problems in living and alcoholism, co-dependency constructed a rhetorical commonality among a widely divergent array of experiences. Process addiction serves as a unifying principle, prociding people with a way of seeing and understanding how their lives have gone as they have and supplying them with a rational and institutional venue for coming together in a common cause, as well as a shared set of meanings to articulate that cause.

"toxic sahme is the core od addiction"

Shame serves as a synonym for co-dependency and thus is understood as the cause of a wide range of behaviors.

shame spiral vicious circle

Co-Dependents Anonymous is a fellowship of men and women whose common problem is an inability to maintain functional relationships. We share with one naother the hopes of solving our common problem and helping others to recover; the only requirement for membership is a desire for health and fulfilling relationships with others and ourselves. CoDA is not allied with an sect,

At present, no single theory of addictions dominates thinking in the mental health profession or comprehensively informs about clinical interventions. This article examines the biochemical and psychosocial commonalties of dependence disorders and concludes that similar addictive processes appear to be the foundation of a variety of addictive behaviors. Codependence is suggested as the underlying psychological dynamic pervasive in a host of addictive disorders. Implications for the treatment of codependence as the foundation of addictions is discussed, and a number of intervention strategies are suggested to work with the individual on ldquofamily of originrdquo issues. I would like to thank J. Edward Lynch, Sharon Wegscheider-Cruse, Jo Cruse, Stanley Sunderwirth, my students, and persons in my groups for their contributions to the conceptual development of this article. I am also grateful to Richard Loughead and Paul Wright for their timely and comprehensive reviews of earlier drafts of this manuscript.

The Co-dependents Anonymous Checklist

Co-Dependents Anonymous Checklist (CoDA). This test is a self-report, 38-item Likerttype (1 to 5) scale that was created by a support group called Co-Dependents Anonymous. The scale is used to determine the presence of codependence and to identify those who can find help and understanding at CoDA meetings. A sample item is, “I feel good about myself only when I am helping others.” The total score ranges from 38 to 190, with higher scores reflecting greater codependency. No data on the psychometric status of this instrument were found in the published literature. The questionnaire was obtained from Whitfield’s (1991) book.

Charles L. Whitfield (1991). Co-dependence: Healing the human condition. Deerfield Beach, FL: Communications, Inc. 155874150X September 1, 1991 Publisher: HCI (Health Communications, Inc) OCLC: 23180004

codependency was negatively related to self-confidence and positively related to succorance. However, contrary to expectation, a negative relationship between codependency and autonomy was not found. In addition, low self-confidence was the strongest predictor of codependency. Finally, all threee measures of codependency were strong related, attesting to the convergent validity of the Spann-Fischer Codependency scale. Future studies should further investigate the role of emotional autonomy and codependency and should beging to utilize an experimental appraoch, making predictions regarding the behavior of codependent and noncodependent persons in experimental situations.