User:Schenkstroop/Sandbox

response
There is alot to unpack here.

Your tone against people who disagree with you
First of all, its noteworthy that you describe anyone disagreeing with your exact view as someone who "is watering down [Evola's] views to make them more palatable", as a nazi who "secretly approves" Evola's views. It seems dishonest to label anyone who disagrees with you as a covert nazi. And what about the Kevin Coogan quote? Coogan is an historian and a scholar of fascism. Is he a nazi with a secret agenda too because he thinks Evola didn't believe in anti-semitic conspiracy theories? To be honest with you I am a communist and an anti-fascist. I just don't think "antisemitic conspiracy theorist" should be in the first sentence of the article.

Antisemitism and antisemitic conspiracy theorist
Its obvious that Evola was an antisemite. I do not deny that. The quote I provided even proves that point. However this is something else than describing someone as an antisemitic conspiracy theorist in the first sentence of the article. Evola is not mainly known for producing antisemitic conspiracy theories. In fact, there isn't even academic consensus about whether he should be viewed as an antisemitic conspiracy theorist, as the Coogan quote proves.

Consensus
So when was the consensus that restrict users from editing established? Could you reference that? It seems like alot of people in this talk thread are against the designation "antisemitic conspiracy theorist.
 * Talk:Julius_Evola
 * [[Talk:Julius Evola/Archive 5