User:Schnickelfritz66/Women Strike for Peace/Cherubj Peer Review

General info
https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/users/23omoell04
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/users/Schnickelfritz66


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Schnickelfritz66/Women Strike for Peace
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Women Strike for Peace

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

- Well done on the minor edits to correct the typos and refine word choice in the lead.

Content:

- The content added is relevant to the topic of the Women's Strike for Peace (WSP) organization, covering its formation, motivations, and activities.

- The information appears up-to-date, focusing on historical events such as the Capitol strike on November 1st.

- The article primarily deals with the WSP's activities and does not deviate into unrelated topics.

- The article addresses an equity gap by highlighting the role of historically underrepresented populations, specifically women, in peace activism.

Tone and Balance:

- The content added maintains a neutral tone, presenting information objectively.

- There are no apparent claims heavily biased toward a particular position.

- The viewpoints presented are balanced, focusing on the perspectives of the WSP and its supporters.

- The content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or another.

Sources and References:

- The content is thoroughly supported by reliable secondary sources, ensuring credibility and accuracy. However, it's important to note that the in-text citations are manually written and not set in the correct format. To ensure proper citation, it's recommended to use the citation tool in the top home tab or utilize the shortcut Ctrl+Shift+K, which will automatically footnote the citations based on their numbering.

Organization:

- The content added appears well-written, being concise, clear, and easy to read.

- There are no apparent grammatical or spelling errors.

- The content is well-organized, with clear section headings that reflect the major points of the topic.

Overall Impressions:

- The content added improves the overall quality of the article, making it completer and more informative.