User:Schu4379/Snow algae/Linneajohnston Peer Review

General info
I am reviewing Schu4379 and Mismosptk's article on Snow Algae. I see that initially, this article did not have any information added to it and so these two users are planning on creating an entire article.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Schu4379/Snow algae
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Snow algae

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead is nice and clear and introduces and defines the concepts well. Summarizes main points of the article, and succinctly describes all of the important parts of this algae.

Content: Content is relevant and well-cited. Sources are of scholarly origin and have been peer reviewed. I would've loved to see more information about their role in a ecosystem, but the information provided is sufficient.

Organization: Article is well-organized and the spacing of paragraphs is appropriate for wikipedia. There are no spelling or grammatical errors.

New Article: The article is supported by reliable sources. There are 18 sources, 8 more than were required for this project. The article follows the patterns of other articles on wikipedia. The article also links to other articles.

Overall, I found this article to be very complete and polished. The information is sound and the article flows nicely with other wikipedia articles. I think that in some of the shorter sections (I.E. ecological role) there could have been more added to round out the section but in all, the article is very professional and well done!