User:Schu4379/Snow algae/LynSchwendy Peer Review

General info
Schu4379
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Schu4379/Snow algae
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Snow algae

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is well done and does a great job of summarizing the article and touching on all the points that will show up later without including extra information or leaving anything important out.

All the information is not only relevant, but well organized. The content is up to date and there doesn’t appear to be any extra unnecessary information. That said I think it could be beneficial to add some geographic information about where snow algae can be found.

The tone was solid and didn’t seem to lean one way or another. It came across as informative and not as if it was an attempt to convince anyone of anything. Everything also seems to have received equal space.

The links all worked and appeared to be from reliable secondary sources. It covered a wide breadth of research and seems faithful to the content of the sources.

Overall, this was a great addition to the topic. It was strong in almost every way, and the only thing I can think of that might improve it would be to add in some geographic information regarding where snow algae can be found.