User:Schwahay1/Free Appropriate Public Education/LadyofArkham Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Schwahay1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Schwahay1/Free_Appropriate_Public_Education?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Free Appropriate Public Education

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The Lead does not begin with an introduction sentence or topic sentence of any kind. The Lead is very basic and undetailed. The layout is structured to appear like bullets points instead of sentences which does not follow the same structure of the rest of the article. The Lead needs more detail and new structure to fit with the rest of the article.

Content

The added Content is relevant to the topic. The added Content was new to the original article. The article was detailing the Free Appropriate Public Education act that enables free public education. The added Content added a subsection of private schools and FAPE that was not in the original article. The Content about the disabled children are entitled to receive FAPE should not be under the Lead of Private Schools and FAPE. The Content does not necessarily deal with topics that seem to be underrepresented, education seems to be a fairly common topic of interest.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the added Content is neutral, as is required. The author does a good job of only stating facts from their sources, without choosing any side or attempting to sway the reader in any way.

Sources and References

Content is backed by reliable sources, and the author used more than one source for information. The author does a good job of taking the source content and staying true to it, in their added Content to the article. One of the sources is a dated, 2008 while the other is more recent 2017. Even if the information is the same, having a more recent source is preferred.

Organization

The Content is easy to read, but then again not detailed enough. The structure was brought up earlier and it still applies, the added section needs to reflect the rest of the article and it does not do this. It makes the added section seem very out of place and draws much attention to it.

Images and Media

There was no added images to the article which would have been not necessary to begin with. The section did not need any pictures added to it.