User:Schwammy1/Spoiler (media)/Icarlee3338 Peer Review

General info
Schwammy1/Spoiler (media)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Spoiler (media)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Spoiler (media)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is very well composed and introduces the idea of "spoiler" clearly. I liked how they mentioned the three different types of spoilers and then begin to quickly define each. It doesn't seem like the lead introduces each of the subheadings that are talked about as you read on.

I like how it is organized and constructed. Learning about the history before anything is mentioned is smart. Ending the history section with talking about social media and then starting the new section of different mediums was a good segway. The different mediums section has a good amount of examples but a few more wouldn't hurt.

Positive and negative effects are well written. Positive effects seem to have more information, maybe showcase some studies or cases to prove how it positively impacts. Same goes with negative effects. It doesn't seem like it talks much about the psychological impact it has on the viewer. It mainly just talks about the cons of spoilers. Need to learn more about the actual mental effects spoilers have on an audience.

The reference section also seems like it needs to be adjusted.

Overall, I really like this section and the additions you guys made! Good job