User:Schwammy1/Spoiler (media)/Izzyabella2003 Peer Review

General info
Schwammy1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Schwammy1/Spoiler (media)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Spoiler (media)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The lead has been sufficiently updated to reflect the new content added by my peers. The lead includes a description of the articles’ major sections. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise.
 * The content added is absolutely relevant to the topic. The content added was up-to-date. There is no content that is missing. The content does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.
 * The content added was neutral. There were no claims that appeared heavily biased toward a particular position. There are no viewpoints that are over or under-represented, and the content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.
 * All content added is backed up by a reliable, secondary source of information. The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. The sources are thorough. The sources are current. The sources are diverse.
 * The content added was very well-written, concise, clear, and easy to read. The content added has no grammatical or spelling errors. The contact added is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.
 * No images or media were added.
 * The content added does improve the overall quality of the article and the strength of the content is that it updates the topic to current times and it accounts for the topic's presence in different media.