User:Schwammy1/Spoiler (media)/Ylt22 Peer Review

General info
Schwammy1/Spoiler
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Schwammy1/Spoiler (media)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Spoiler (media)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The Lead has been changed. It keeps the same introductory paragraph so introduce the topic of the article, however they added two more paragraphs to this section. The lead does not provide a brief description of what the article covers. But they did add a lot more information about spoilers and the different types. It states a lot of information that is not stated in the article, therefore I would say that it could be considered overly detailed. The History section was changed a lot. A lot of the original article has been edited out and more information added. The change from Websites and policies and features to Spoilers in different mediums was smart. The breakdown with multiple subheadings makes it easier to read and provides more information. Same goes for the Psychological effect heading. The content added is relevant and up-to-date. It does no deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The content added is neutral. The content added does not seem to over or under represent one side. Some of the new information lacks reliable sources. When cited though, the content does reflect what the cited sources say. The sources appear to be thorough and current. The content added is well-written. Just lacks some sourcing and linking to other Wikipedia pages. There are no added images. The article is more complete with these changes.