User:Scienceislife22/Nitrososphaera/Mroghair Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Scienceislife22


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Scienceislife22/Nitrososphaera
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your goal with a peer review is to identify specific ways the article could be improved, and note any major problems that ought to be fixed. Consider these questions:

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Yes, everything is relevant and there don't appear to be distractors

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

Seems neutral

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Seems well represented

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

All the links work and appear to support what they're citing.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

Yes, this seems unbiased and well cited

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

You've got a few sections that don't look like they've been finished

Other notes:


 * You're missing info in the Article Body and Morphology sections
 * You could add a lot more Wikipedia hyperlinks to your article if you wanted. for example: ammonia oxidizing archaea, mesophilic, Crenarchaeota, chemolithoautotroph, ammonia oxidation, nitrification...
 * Other than the fact that you are missing most of two of your sections, the two sections that are finished look really nice. They're easy to understand, well cited, and flow nicely. No extraneous information. Good start!