User:Scientist.alg.4/Teuthology/Sam121302 Peer Review

General info
Scientist.alg.4
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Scientist.alg.4/Teuthology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Teuthology

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think this is a great start! Your sources are very recent and a good addition to the article. It is very good to be adding five more resources since there was only one liked to the article before your edits. What you have written is written in the right way. It is not personal at all and written scientifically. I would try to expand on what you have written though. Especially where there is the 2022 section where there are three articles used to cite two sentences. I think a little more information about what the articles were on would be beneficial for those who would like to know more about teuthology. Or, when talking about how an article was revisited, you could discuss what was changed or described more in detail. But, overall, the writing was very profession and is a great start!