User:Sciephymath/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Citarum River

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Water pollution is related to SDG 6. Several articles regarding water pollution in different countries was available, yet Citarum river was the only article about water pollution in Indonesia. The article is also lack of data and information is not up to date.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

- The overview looks good but the context of the article is not enough and the article has made a lot of claim without citing reliable sources.

- There are also several references that are not available. The data and information are also not up-to-date.

- The article is easy to read and well-organized.

- The image used is also not violating the copyright violations, but unfortunately, it is not up to date

- There aren't much conversations in the talk page. The only conversation is adding external sources. The article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia and WikiProject Rivers.

- Overall the article is well-organized and easy to read. But, some claim have to add reliable and up-to-date sources along with renewing the references.