User:ScoobyDoo78263/Mining/LazerRocDoc Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ScoobyDoo78263


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ScoobyDoo78263/Mining?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mining

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

- N/A

Content

- The content added is relevant to the topic

- Some of the content is quite up to date (2010), others are not very out of date (2000ish).

- There does not appear to by content missing from the contribution.

- N/A

Tone and Balance

- The content added is neutral.

- There are no biased claims.

- There are no over or under represented view points.

- The content added does not attempt to sway the reader from one position to another.

Sources and Reference

- The added content is all backed up by reliable sources.

- The new content accurately reflects information from the given sources.

- With respect to the added content, the sources are thorough and provide enough backing for the contribution.

- The sources are fairly current (2000ish & 2010)

- The sources come from a diverse spectrum of authors.

- The sources provided are peer reviewed and reliable.

- The links both work.

Organization

- The added content is well written, concise, clear, and easy to read.

- There are no issues with grammar and spelling

- The added content appears to be one paragraph and therefore can not be organized poorly.

Images and Media

- The article does not contain new images or media.

- Remaining points are N/A

Overall impressions

- What has been added is well written and well sourced. It is easy to read as it contains no grammatical or spelling errors and flows well. I'm not sure if there was more intended to be uploaded, but overall I would say the added paragraph does not contribute much to the article in any meaningful way.

- The added content does provide some relatively meaningful statistics with the application of explosives in regards to mining.

- It seems like part of what was written in this paragraph would fit well in the "safety" subsection in Mining. Also, as explosives does not already have a subsection on the Mining page, it might be worth considering creating a subsection within Techniques, specifically discussing explosives in more depth.