User:Scooterbenjamin/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Climate change education

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason that I chose this article is to give people attention to the impact of climate change. Climate change matters all the living being in the planet earth. We should aware the consequences of climate change and the causes of the climate change. The only way to save the world is everyone in the world gives attentions to how to protect environment.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this article is clearly states the information of climate change education. All the sentences are very concise. The lead section has a brief demonstration of the article. All information are present in the article. The lead section of the article is respectively concise.

The article's content is relevant to the topic, and most of the content is from the recent resources. The content seems nothing is missing or unrelated, and the the address topic is not related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

The article is fairly neutral, but it claims are appear some biased toward the developing countries such as Vietnam. Some of the viewpoints are underrepresented, and minority viewpoints are not described neutrally. The article is in the neutral position and does not persuade the reader to stand by its point of view.

Most of the facts are backed up by some reliable secondary or primary resources. The sources are reflect the available literature on the topic, and it is current. Some sources are better to be replaced by some alternative sources. For examples, in the selected country profiles regarding CCE and ESD, those countries' supportive references could based on their own countries' language or articles other than others regions. All the sources should included both objective and subjective perspectives. Therefore, the article itself could be more objective and reliable. All of the links are seems working.

The article is well organized, clear, and concise. There is no obvious grammatically error occur in the article. The article is well organized with sub-section and bullet point, and all of its content is reflecting to the topic.

There is no image included in the article.

The talk page shows the conversation of some scientific argument, and the authenticity and eligibility of the article is stated clearly. The article is part of the WikiProjects. The topic seems to be the same way we discussed in class.

Overall, the article is fairly a neutral article with some objective sources. The article is moderate strong but still lack of some neutral and unbiased supportive sources. Other than outside sources, the article could include some inside sources such as the selected countries itself. Using those countries' owned language and owned expert articles will gain the different point of view toward the article. The article is fairly an underdeveloped article.