User:Scott/Notes/Policy changes

Wikipedia has no coherent record of how and when changes to policy (I use the term loosely to include "accepted practice") have occurred. Many changes have been entirely forgotten.

Behavioral concerns
In early 2004, following the requested de-sysopping of The Cunctator in December 2003, there were several attempts at establishing processes for raising concerns over an administrator's actions along the lines of the "request for comment" model. Requests for comment itself was created at the same time and eventually absorbed them.


 * Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 9 (January 2004)
 * Wikipedia talk:De-adminship (January-March 2004, merged into the below)
 * Wikipedia talk:Possible misuses of sysop rights (January-December 2004)
 * Wikipedia talk:Requests for review of administrative actions (January-June 2004)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents subsequently became the standard venue for doing so. [Details?]

In 2021, a review of the requests for adminship process initiated a new process, Administrative action review.

User talk pages
an editor added this text to User pages, a month after someone else had commented on the talk page that "My impression is that the standard has been to not delte [sic] user talk pages":

It survives in modified form today at WP:DELTALK.

Until 2010 there was a habit, without any formal policy basis, of deleting the talk pages of indefinitely blocked users. Discussions in early 2008 led to the deletion of a template used to tag "temporary" user talk pages, but people kept adding the pages by hand into a category for it, until that was finally deleted in 2010. Thousands of user talk pages were deleted this way - for example, in 2008 a single admin deleted nearly 12,000 of them.


 * Wikipedia talk:User pages/Archive 2 (November 2006)
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Archive121 (January 2008)
 * Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 27 (January 2008)
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Archive137 (April 2008)
 * Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 29 (April 2008)
 * Wikipedia talk:User page/Archive 4 (April 2008)
 * Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 10 (April 2008)
 * Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 33 (March 2009)
 * Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy/Archive 34 (April 2009)
 * Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 36 (September 2009)
 * Categories for discussion/Log/2010 July 12 (July 2010)
 * Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAT:TEMP (August 2010)
 * Wikipedia talk:Courtesy vanishing/Archive 1 (November 2010)

Speedy deletion
Speedy deletion on Wikipedia is an extensive area of policy which has been assembled ad-hoc over decades, and logging the times at which and reasons why will require significant effort. It does however have the rare distinction among policy pages of having a list of the discussions which led to the retirement of obsolete criteria.

Speedy deletions were originally handled at Wikipedia:Speedy deletions, until they were superseded in 2008 by the CSD templates.

Redirects to user pages for renamed users
CSD U2 permits the speedy deletion of some user pages:

It was created, less than two hours after being proposed as:

an editor unilaterally added conditions, which went unremarked-upon:

This remained unchanged for the next seven years. an editor removed the parenthetical condition, after an extremely brief discussion which itself was only referring to an even briefer discussion they had had elsewhere with a single editor, whose opinion was "There is usually little to no harm in leaving the redirects be."

This ruling has been holy writ ever since, despite having the flimsiest of foundations.

User subpages
A discussion from September 2003 predating the introduction of "speedy deletion":
 * Wikipedia talk:Personal subpages to be deleted

In the mid-2000s many users had "secret" subpages as a game for other users to find. A controversial purge in 2008 wiped out most of them and disagreement over the topic continued for at least a couple of years after without establishing a basis in policy. This essay by the late editor Bahamut0013 goes into detail and links to many contemporary discussions.

Notability
Early discussions in 2004-6 leading up to the formalization of our policy of notability have been collected, and former user Pixelface put together a highly detailed implementation timeline in 2008.

Vandalism

 * Abuse response ran from 2006-2013 - created by Essjay, of all people