User:Scott3/Policy in one page

In attempt to prevent wikipedia from becoming a burracrrcy and to make it eaiser for users(espically new ones) this page will simplify it(probally useing the polciy in a nutshell) and put into one page.

Assume good faith
Assume that others are trying to help Wikipedia rather than harm it, unless there is clear and present evidence to the contrary.

Biographies of living persons
Articles about living persons must adhere strictly to NPOV and verifiability policies. Be very firm about high-quality references, particularly about details of personal lives. Unsourced or poorly sourced negative material about living persons should be removed immediately from both the article and the talk page. Responsibility for justifying controversial claims rests firmly on the shoulders of the person making the claim.

Editing Policy
Improve pages wherever you can, and don't worry about leaving them imperfect. However, avoid deleting information wherever possible.

Ignore all rules
If the rules prevent you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia's quality, ignore them.

Image use policy
Be very careful when uploading copyrighted images, fully describe images' sources and copyright details on their description pages, and try to make images as useful and reusable as possible.

Libel
It is Wikipedia policy to delete libellous revisions from the page history. If you believe you have been defamed, please contact the info team.

Naming conventions
Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. ===for catergories Category names should be specific, neutral, inclusive and follow certain conventions, such as "Natural history of Venezuela", "Hospitals in Denmark" or "Australian journalists ==Neutral point of view All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias. This includes all content, e.g. illustrations, reader-facing templates, categories and portals.

No legel threats
Do not make threats or claims of legal action against users or Wikipedia itself. If you have a dispute with user(s) or the Community, use dispute resolution. If you see a legal problem such as defamation or copyright infringement, a polite report is welcome and will be acted on quickly. If you do choose to take legal action, please refrain from editing until it is resolved.

No original research
Articles may not contain any previously unpublished arguments, concepts, data, ideas, statements, or theories. Moreover, articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published arguments, concepts, data, ideas, or statements that serves to advance a position.

No personal attacks
There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Please do not make them. It is your responsibility to foster and maintain a positive online community in Wikipedia.

Office Actions
Sometimes the Wikimedia Foundation may have to delete, protect or stub a page without going through the normal process(es) to do so. Do not undo these "Office actions" without authorization from Jimbo, Danny, or the Wikimedia Foundation. Violations will likely be treated harshly.

Ownership of articles
Anything submitted to Wikipedia may be modified by others. No one has to clear any changes with any previous editors.

Sock puppetry
Do not use multiple accounts to create the illusion of greater support for an issue, to mislead others, or to circumvent a block. Do not ask your friends to create accounts to support you or anyone else.

The three revert rule
Do not revert any single page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours, except in the case of obvious, simple vandalism. (Or else an administrator may block your account.)

username policy
Choose an inoffensive username with which you'll be happy. Requests for user name changes can usually be fulfilled, but the process can be a hassle.

Verifiabillity
Information on Wikipedia must be reliable and verifiable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed.