User:Scribepedia/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Beth Levin (linguist)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this topic because I was interested in learning about a female linguist, what they are known for and how they contributed to linguistics.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is short and concise yet informative. There is information included that will be covered in other sections. the contents are all related to the topic and up-to-date. There was mostly information about the topic which were stated with no claims or biases. The sources are reliable and the article is organized with short and concise writing with no spelling errors. There is no images included in the article at all. The most recent discussion on the topic was made in 2017 about adding an archive. It is related to the topic and was reviewed.

Overall, the article seems to be very well set up, but there is a lack of images that could be included for better presentation. Unfortunately, there is not a lot of information on the article, but a section about the topic’s early life prior to becoming a linguist could be included.